ext_537 ([identity profile] yonmei.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] trennels 2005-08-31 10:49 am (UTC)

And I never said it was "unlimited wealth". I said "a valuable piece of
jewellery".


What you said was "It wasn't exactly limited in value" - and that is precisely what it was: limited. It was a one-off bonus that could be spent any number of ways. You seem to have come round to the idea that Mrs Marlow spent it sensibly when she bought a horse for herself, rather than being a bad selfish mother - which was the idea that I truly objected to: the idea that a woman is a "bad mother" if she ever spends anything on herself that she doesn't absolutely need when her children are going without things that they want but don't need - which was your starting position - is really rather anti-woman and anti-mother, and generally objectionable. Mrs Marlow bought herself Chocbar, and it was a sensible and right purchase, and you accept that: good.

That there is something skewed about Ginty getting such an expensive present is something I've come round to, having read so many well-reasoned points about it on this thread. But arguing from that to "Mrs Marlow's a bad mother" is something else again.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting