ext_37576 ([identity profile] wonderlanded.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] trennels 2005-10-17 07:57 pm (UTC)

I think your last sentence hits on it exactly -- there isn't.

I've always thought the Chalet as Reformer / Kingscote as Non-reformer played to what the two schools aimed to be to their students -- Kingscote as, rather understandably, an educational institution; Chalet as a way of life. Thus Kingscote has no unwritten set of moral and ethical rules the girls are not only supposed to mirror but to promote; while the Chalet has entrenched standards passed from generation to generation and a collective sense of what's done, and what's not.

For the very reason that Kingscote doesn't have such a strictly defined code, I think the school's less reformist in nature. Because Chalet girls have a very certain sense of What's Right and What's Not, the girls themselves put a lot more effort into ensuring that everyone else is thinking the same, virtuous way and will as a result share in the happy joyfulness of being A Real Chalet Girl. Almost as if the Chalet's a religion, and the girls are evangelists -- while Kingscote's a school, and the girls ordinary schoolgirls.

Or something.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting