ext_40403 (
thekumquat.livejournal.com) wrote in
trennels2015-09-26 01:38 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Patrick's education
Trying to write a fic inspired by some of the recent AO3 additions and a nitpicking community post that came up shortly after. I've re-read Peter's Room and AT, but can't find my copy of RAH.
Am I right that in RAH, Patrick has been dragged to interview at Broomhill and tutors have been suggested, but nothing is confirmed other than the plan to sit his O-levels that June, which will be the same time as Ginty?
Will he still be 16, or turned 17 by then?
Prior to that, he was at his hated London day school from some time after Falconer's Lure to December in Attic Term, so is that one year and a term, or two? I think it's two and a term, so he would have been just turned fourteen and entering third year mid-year? (UIV, as Kingscote and my school would have it)
Presumably he was at a boarding school before that? Would he have been at a prep and then a Catholic boarding school for one year age 13?
Meanwhile, Dartmouth for Peter has the problem of not existing by RAH - is there any mention of Peter doing O-levels there? I'd like to think they push him towards science and practical qualifications and generally not being on their boats, just designing them Somewhere Else. I'm assuming he's then one year behind Ginty and one ahead of the twins, education-wise.
I don't recall either of their birthdays, but have an impression Peter's is spring and Patrick's summer - anyone know?
Am I right that in RAH, Patrick has been dragged to interview at Broomhill and tutors have been suggested, but nothing is confirmed other than the plan to sit his O-levels that June, which will be the same time as Ginty?
Will he still be 16, or turned 17 by then?
Prior to that, he was at his hated London day school from some time after Falconer's Lure to December in Attic Term, so is that one year and a term, or two? I think it's two and a term, so he would have been just turned fourteen and entering third year mid-year? (UIV, as Kingscote and my school would have it)
Presumably he was at a boarding school before that? Would he have been at a prep and then a Catholic boarding school for one year age 13?
Meanwhile, Dartmouth for Peter has the problem of not existing by RAH - is there any mention of Peter doing O-levels there? I'd like to think they push him towards science and practical qualifications and generally not being on their boats, just designing them Somewhere Else. I'm assuming he's then one year behind Ginty and one ahead of the twins, education-wise.
I don't recall either of their birthdays, but have an impression Peter's is spring and Patrick's summer - anyone know?
Posted via m.livejournal.com.
no subject
I think he's two years older than Nicola, and sic months older than Ginty. 15 during FL, and 16 during Attic Term. There's definitely only one year between the end of FL and the beginning of Attic Term. I'm not sure when his birthday is offhand, but probably early summer, so he would be 16 nearly 17 if he did his O levels in the summer. That suggests he might have been put back a year when he started at his London school.
no subject
AT refers to him being put back a year at the London school, but I hadn't realised it was two years off school from the cliff accident.
So then he's just turned 15 in FL, had two years off school so the accident would have been just after turning 13, which would mean presumably missing third year completely and finishing a prep school elsewhere. Which would mean having never been to a senior boarding school - unless the matey establishment in London takes boarders as well as day boys? Do we know any more about it other than from AT?
Will have to read FL and RAH again now (oh the hardship).
no subject
It hasn't been confirmed in RAH whether Patrick's Maths O Level paper will be accepted by the exam board (or if it is, whether he has passed). Broomhill will take him if he's passed; if not the plan is to send him to a crammer to retake it.
I can't recall Peter's O Levels ever being mentioned. According to Wikepedia, Dartmouth raised its leaving age to 16 in 1948, which was 3 years before O level exams replaced the former 'school certificate' so given that a universe in which anyone would take O Levels at Dartmouth is entirely hypothetical, I would say for fic purposes you have free rein to create it as you wish!
no subject
It was Dartmouth raising its entry age to 16, so Peter shouldn't be there even in canon, that I was thinking of. I figure the Marlowverse could have ended up with a version where the now-under-age pupils attend essentially a boarding school where Cadets is taken extra-seriously.
no subject
Nicola: You mean he's taking you?
Patrick: Well - that's not settled. If I've passed O-level Maths yes - on condition I junk the idea of A-level English and History [because the Broomhill head sees these as soft options]
Nicola: Blimey! What would you take instead?
Patrick: Languages? French and Italian, perhaps? [...]
Nicola: And suppose you haven't passed Maths?
Patrick: Then I have to take it again, but not at Broomhil - a crammer's or a tutor [to prove he has guts]
Patrick then points out that if he fails Maths on the second attempt, Broomhill is out & he would have a much better chance of being allowed to do English and History studying at home (which he said in a previous conversation he would ideally like to do). It's noted that Nicola takes it for granted he wouldn't deliberately fail in order to get what he wants. Patrick concludes that if he must go to another school, Broomhill "sounds more entertaining than most. I reckon I'd just about survive two years"
So yes, he can only go there if he already has his full complement of O-levels, to do A-levels in subjects approved by the Head.
Sorrow, I meant to say 'entry' rather than 'leaving' re. Dartmouth - I was typing just after coming back from a v. stressful day at work!
no subject
I got the impression from AT that he was taking the November exams because he was already older than he should be, ie had been 16 in the previous year, so by the following school year, he would be 17. Ginty makes a comment about the only people at Kingscote who do November exams are the dim people who failed in UV (and, by implication need retakes for university purposes).
no subject
I'd forgotten maths was a prerequisite for all degrees - it was just 5 subjects by the time I did A-level, which meant a friend whose comp had experimented with top set doing Eng and Maths two years early refused to do any more GCSEs on the grounds they were boring, did Maths, Further Maths and Physics A-level, but also had to do another GCSE to make up his five subjects. So he also turned 16 a few months after starting at Cambridge and was one of the reasons they now won't take under-17s.
no subject
no subject
AT - Ginty reassures Patrick that it couldn't be shaming to fail his "levels" having missed two years of school -
P: "... Besides, falling off cliffs isn't any sort of excuse by now. Not when I'm taking Levels a year late as it is."
G: "Don't they work you hard! Only the terribly bright people take them at fifteen at our place unless their parents insist."
P: "And you're not and your parents didn't?"
[And so on to the agonising 'really do you love me' conversation!]
The inference here is that Patrick would be taking them in November, aged 16, whereas his fellow pupils would only be 15 - but this was considered unusual by Ginty; Kingscote pupils would expect to take them in summer, aged 16.
no subject
If his birthday is in the summer, he should have been 15 going into the 5th year and may still only have been 15 if he'd taken his O levels at the "normal" time.
no subject
I can't recollect any clues to when in the year Patrick's birthday occurs. My headcanon has him as a Scorpio, but I don't think that's actually based on anything!
I would guess from Ginty's conversation that he'll be 16 in Attic Term's November - just because he says, I'm taking them a year late, everyone else is 15; she says to reassure him, it's rare for people at my school to take them before the age of 16.
no subject
My problem is my RAH is a hardback which doesn't fit with my Armada school AFs, Puffin PR and TTA, and the GGB MatT and RMF, so the three sizes are in different places...
no subject
Books
no subject
Any views as to whether Broomhill is day or boarding?
I think my new personal timeline is Easter after RAH, Patrick is still 16, cramming for maths and a couple other O-levels and preparing for A's in humanities at Broomhill, Ginty is now 16 and revising for her own O-levels which makes a great excuse to avoid Patrick, Peter has been convinced by Dartmouth he shows promise in craftmanship and engineering and to follow a non-officer career.
A year later Patrick will be 17 in his Easter hols, in lower 6th at Broomhill, Ginty has some unspectacular O-levels and is in the Lower Sixth uncertain of her future, Peter is 15/16 and swotting like mad to get some excellent O-levels in the hope of a scholarship to Anywhere Other than Dartmouth. Peter and Patrick are thus both underage for drinking in a pub and Forestian time dilation means it's 1985.
Meanwhile back in the past, (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonia_Forest helped!) Patrick's accident was a year before Autumn Term, so if Ginty is 2 years ahead of N&L she would have been entering Lower Fourth, and Patrick would have completed Lower Fourth (ie seond year) either at a prep or senior school but not beyond that.
Patrick then skips to Lower Fifth (ie repeating one of the years he missed) and is in LV and UV at the same time as Ginty, so he'd have started LV at the London day school when End of Term started. I think it's at least internally consistent...
no subject
When Broomhill is described as 'tough' I always think of Gordonstoun and imagine it being in Scotland, or at least somewhere fairly far north. Interestingly, though, Sally Hayward in her continuation novel interpreted 'tough' as meaning there were frequent riots and violent pupils there.
Your timeline seems to be consistent as far as I can judge!
no subject
Patrick's birthday - when?
Re: Patrick's birthday - when?
(Anonymous) 2015-09-28 12:00 am (UTC)(link)Might as well be April as any other time, though.
Colne_dsr
Re: Patrick's birthday - when?
Re: Patrick's birthday - when?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-09-28 12:06 am (UTC)(link)Nicola and Lawrie would be in the same school year as him, except that they appear to have missed a year too. Probably because of their incessant illnesses up to age 12.
Colne_dsr
no subject
IRL my uncles are six months apart (because one was adopted from within the wider family), and one of them got into trouble at school because one of the teachers refused to believe they were brothers and not cousins.
no subject
Actually there's a whole angle for fic - Peter is actually adopted... Is he really Aunt Molly's child?
I think I'll keep Peter one year behind Ginty and one ahead of the twins (even if they should be in his year but repeated one), so making his birthday in late September would work.
Close enough for government work, as they say...
no subject
"We were discussing the fact that, given the author's note at the beginning of Marlows and the Traitor, which says that Peter must be 14 when it starts (Easter holidays), and the fact that Ginty becomes 15 on January 6th in Peter's Room, there is no way Peter and Ginty could be siblings. Various theories were suggested to explain this 3-4 month gap, such as them being twins with a very large delay between births, and Ginty being the adopted love-child of Geoff Marlow and Auntie Mollie, which accounts for him having given his wife a necklace when she was born, and the trip to Paris.
"These thrilling speculations were slightly crushed by Sue Sims telling us that she had brought up the birthdays issue with Forest and Forest had said oh yes, she was never very good at dates (I'm paraphrasing here. If any of you who were there remember exactly what she said, or happen to be Sue Sims, please correct me)."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-03 07:45 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-03 08:09 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-03 08:27 pm (UTC)(link)no subject