ext_7722 ([identity profile] childeproof.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] trennels2006-01-25 05:30 pm

two minor queries

Re-reading the beginning of Attic Term and two things struck me for the umpteenth time. And now that I have somewhere to niggle, quibble and poke...

One was that the Marlows and Merricks always have dinner in the middle of the day, or at least a meal which is referred to as dinner and which is clearly fairly substantial (involving in Nicola's case gammon and salad, followed by damson pudding, all wheeled in by Doris). In fact, midday dinner becomes a minor plot point in, I think, Run Away Home when the indefatigable Mrs Bertie, presumably weary of continually putting up sandwiches for various Marlows, says she plans to ask Mrs Marlow if they can have dinner in the evening instead.

Now, while I grew up on midday dinner as a working-class child in 1970s Ireland, I wondered about the (a) the logic and (b) the class issues surrounding midday dinner in the (admittedly sliding) timescale of the Marlow novels. Midday dinner, as distinct from midday 'lunch' and an evening dinner, has always been a working class arrangement for me, or, I gather, a regional designation for any kind of midday meal in some places. (But, I thought northern, so not Trennels, then.) Also, while I see the logic of active outdoor workers like Rowan having a substantial midday meal for energy purposes, but it seems deeply inconvenient for all at Trennels in the school holidays...? And while I am capable of appreciating the various factors that contributed to the moving around of the dinner-hour in the 18th and 19thc - fashion, snobbery, daylight vs artificial light etc - I realise I know much less about the moving about of mealtimes in the latter half of the 20thc.

Are the Marlows representative of their time and class in their meal times? (What do they eat at night and what do they call it? Am only recalling the much more informal meals, like the late-night omelettes of Run Away Home, and speaking of which - I've always been intrigued by the sweet and rum omelettes, of which I have never previously heard. My partner claims Forest must mean crepes or pancakes, but I say that if she says omelettes, that's what she means...)

Second question, which is actually just that, as I know little or nothing of hunting:

At the post-cubbing Merrick breakfast table at the beginning of Attic Term, Mr Merrick is unobtrusively defending Nicola against the mild-but-not-all-that-pleasant jibes of Patrick and Ginty about her riding skills. When Nicola retorts to some remark about a hunting fall she had the previous season by saying to Patrick 'And you jumped on me, near's no matter', Mr Merrick's eyebrows 'commented unfavourably on this breach of hunting etiquette.'

Now, is the actual 'breach of hunting etiquette' the fact that Patrick almost jumped on the fallen Nicola, or the fact that one or both of them has breached hunting manners by dragging up old scores from the previous year which should be put to bed politely by now?
liadnan: (Default)

[personal profile] liadnan 2006-01-25 06:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Re the latter question the breach is Patrick nearly jumping on her (for which, see Peter's Room, Patrick's behaviour was even worse than Nicola lets on if I remember rightly)

[identity profile] blonde222.livejournal.com 2006-01-25 07:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Really? I have always been sure it was that it is very bad manners to bring up the fact that someone fell off.

[identity profile] ex-ajhalluk585.livejournal.com 2006-01-25 08:33 pm (UTC)(link)
No; I got enough out of riding lessons (not that I ever jumped anything bigger than a fallen log, and that by accident) to realise that being ribbed about falling off was part of being accepted as part of the gang: the point was that Patrick must have seen her take the toss, and should have not gone into the mess on the other side, which risked him not only killing her but also her (actually his) pony (he should have pulled up before jumping). But the real bad behaviour is his looking back indifferently and riding on, before even checking if his own elderly pony has been injured in the fall, let alone the daughter of his father's nearest neighbours.

[identity profile] ex-ajhalluk585.livejournal.com 2006-01-25 08:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Sorry - that came out the wrong way round. Patrick's first duty was to Mr Buster, of course.

[identity profile] blonde222.livejournal.com 2006-01-25 08:37 pm (UTC)(link)
i totally agree about seeing her and Buster in a mess and just blitheley going on - that's the only time I've thought "what a tosser" about Patrick.

[identity profile] ex-ajhalluk585.livejournal.com 2006-01-25 08:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes; it's possible he hadn't seen her fall (though unlikely assuming she wasn't jumping something six foot high, that Buster plainly was having second thoughts about the take-off, and that Patrick was looking at the jump as he approached it) but seeing that she had fallen and going on anyway still in his fantasy world is just creepy. It's why she hits his hand with the sword-hilt (that's explicit in the text) and she's quite right to do so. I've always wondered why the others seem so indifferent to the idea of having to explain away Patrick's apparently suicided corpse.

(Anonymous) 2006-01-27 05:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, the point in PR is definitely that something that would normally be so important to Patrick (brought up with hunting etiquette - and she's his friend) is now completely subsumed to the fantasy world.

Patrick's corpse?

[identity profile] colne-dsr.livejournal.com 2006-01-27 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Peter had (he thought!) checked all the guns earlier in the book. They never expected it to go off.

Re: Patrick's corpse?

[identity profile] ex-ajhalluk585.livejournal.com 2006-01-28 09:00 am (UTC)(link)
Patrick was brought up (and indeed, recites elsewhere in canon) with the excellent maxim

"Never ever let your gun
Pointed be at anyone
That unloaded it may be
Matters not the least to me".

At least two actors I can name - Brandon Bruce Lee and Mr Campbell of the Queen's Theatre Manchester - have died because a prop gun which was supposed to be unloaded wasn't, and although Peter had no reason to suspect either that his initial check was flawed or that the gun had been reloaded since he made it basic good practice ought to have suggested discharging it into empty air a few times before using it on that occasion. The problem was, of course, that they didn't plan to use the gun at all, and Patrick was so "in character" that he practically willed the bullet into existence.

[identity profile] ex-ajhalluk585.livejournal.com 2006-01-29 05:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Given that one isn't supposed to jump on top of hounds (someone who overrode and killed a hound was once told by the MFH of the Cheshire Hunt, irrespective of the presence of the Empress of Austria within earshot, that "he deserved to be taken to Tarporley and publicly buggered by six drunken Irish navvies") which are smaller and move quicker than riders I've always assumed it was the rule that one shouldn't be so close behind the rider in front as to jump on them (a bit like not tailgating) but [livejournal.com profile] clanwilliam's the expert on these matters.

Lunch or dinner

[identity profile] mrs-redboots.livejournal.com 2006-01-25 06:31 pm (UTC)(link)
I think there are several reasons they would have eaten at lunchtime rather than suppertime.

1) Mrs Bertie and Doris were there during the day but not in the evening (cf Run Away Home, where Giles shows off making omelettes), so if they were going to do the cooking, it was more convenient to eat at lunchtime.

2) Those still at boarding-school would have had their main meal then, for similar reasons.

3) Even if they hadn't had Mrs B and Doris to cook for them, they might well have eaten at lunchtime as with nobody coming home in the evening to demand a meal after a hard day at the office, it got the cooking over and done with! I know my mother preferred to cook for my father at lunchtime and have a lighter supper ("I'm not doing potatoes twice in one day!") so that she didn't have to sweat over a hot stove when she was tired. At that, she still does.....
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] wonderlanded.livejournal.com 2006-01-25 07:38 pm (UTC)(link)
But in Nancy's day lunch/dinner were more of an upper/middle divide (U and non-U) rather than a upper and middle/working class divide. How it moved over the years is something that no amount of googling has yet turned up.

Oh! I've just remembered that in Nancy's own words, while U-adults have lunch in the middle of the day, U-children and U-dogs have dinner, which might explain why Mrs Bertie is looking for the change to take place.

From memory, Noblesse Oblige says: "U-speakers eat luncheon in the middle of the day and dinner in the evening. Non-U speakers (also U-children and U-dogs) have their dinner in the middle of the day."

The Marlows are fairly clearly upper-middle, which might explain the (somewhat anachronistic) change.
owl: Stylized barn owl (Default)

[personal profile] owl 2006-01-30 11:53 am (UTC)(link)
A U/non-U divide, and no-one can say the Marlows are non-U.
gillo: (castle)

[personal profile] gillo 2006-01-25 07:22 pm (UTC)(link)
It's a regional thing as well as a class thing - the more Northern you are the more likely you are to have a cooked midday meal and call it "dinner". As a child growing up in the Midlands in the 60s/70s I was used to talking about "school dinners" and "dinner time" at midday - or, rather, about 1.00. We were solidly middle class, though not upper-middle like the Marlows.

Yes, they are omelettes, not crepes or pancakes. There's a range of recipes, but in essence you add sugar and flavouring like rum to the yolks, whisk up the whites and fold the yolk mixture in, then fry the lot in butter as for a savoury pancake. Alternatively make a normal pancake (but no salt/pepper or herbs!) and put a dollop of jam in when part-cooked, where you might normally add cheese, ham etc.

[identity profile] ex-ajhalluk585.livejournal.com 2006-01-29 06:00 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree - but it's a sweet omelette with jam that features in the dinner in Strong Poison too.

[identity profile] carmine-rose.livejournal.com 2006-01-25 07:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I seem to remember in the bit where Mrs B asks to change to the evening, Mrs Marlow says they only had it in the middle of the day while the girls were young? I assumed it was because they would have been too tired to stay up til 9 or whatever to have a proper grown-up meal when they were younger, so Mrs Marlow, what with her husband being away most of the time, had hers with them and they just continued like that out of habit.
coughingbear: im in ur shipz debauchin ur slothz (Default)

[personal profile] coughingbear 2006-01-25 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, I thought the same thing, children have their main meal in the middle of the day, while adults have dinner in the evening, but they all eat together while Captain Marlow is away. I do tend to assume there is adults' dinner when he's at home but can't think if there's any indication of this - perhaps I'll have to re-read Falconer's Lure.

[identity profile] carmine-rose.livejournal.com 2006-01-25 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
I wonder whether Mrs M and Rowan started eating the main meal in the evening during term time... I have to find that passage and check.
owl: Nicola Marlow (nicola)

[personal profile] owl 2006-01-26 12:24 pm (UTC)(link)
I always assumed that the adults had dinner in the evening and that midday dinner was just because they were children. My (middle-class-intellectual) family had dinner in the evening, but when we were in school there was school dinners and we had a separate supper.

Hunting etiquette

[identity profile] emsnan.livejournal.com 2009-06-12 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Although this question is now years old, I found this in a list of rules of hunting etiquette.

"If a rider has fallen before or after a jump, the rest of the mounted field should wait until the fallen rider is up and out of harms way."

Mr Merrick was angry that Patrick hadn't waited for Nick to move out of the way.