[identity profile] lilliburlero.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] trennels
Again, posting on behalf of[personal profile] legionseagle, a little later than planned owing to some email glitches at my end, for which, apologies.

--L.B.



At the Antonia Forest conference in Bournemouth in 2006 someone observed:

"Trennels is basically a TARDIS. It has all these extra buildings which only materialise when the plot needs them." (And dematerialise, too, natch: hence Great-Uncle Lawrence and His Amazing Disappearing Hawkhouse.)

In Peter's Room it's the turn of the Old Shippen (available for general storage, coal- and coke-bunkering and winter hobby pursuits. Black Masses extra.) and the adjacent Old Yard, which has ten-foot high walls and a gate to match. (What were the Marlows who built it trying to keep in? Prize wallabies?)

For the first time since TMATT we have Peter foregrounded. While chopping wood in the Old Yard (so avoiding Madame Orly) he's also making the better acquaintance of Daks, who here makes his first on-screen appearance. Another inventive literary device, the infodump via pedigree poodle pup, and it works rather well, especially given the buttoned up nature of Marlows in general and their attitudes to animals by way of contrast (Mikes observed in How to Be an Alien that it's quite acceptable for the English to have a long walk with their best friend and never exchange a word with him; if one takes one's dog instead you must converse.)

Mrs Bertie – developing traces of a personality here, compared to the stereotype of Falconer's Lure – tells him to stack the chopped wood in the Old Shippen, a disused cowshed across the yard. Daks vanishes, then his barking leads Peter into a hidden room above: a place stuffed with junk and possibilities.

We get a first glimpse of Rowan at work. She, Mr Tranter and Ted Coulthard, the cow man, are building a lambing pen in a bitter wind when Peter arrives to ask if he can use the room for his own purposes. There follow two and a half pages of pure comedy shot through with nice flashes of observation (Rowan, having banged her thumb with a mallet is "concentratedly silent, sucking it").

Discussion of the Old Shippen's murky past leads into one of the themes of the book: the Marlow family's connections with the district and how the "present management" are coping with being simultaneously newcomers and a family with a long and colourful local history.

Harry Marlow, who built the Old Shippen, had a popular reputation for being in league with the Devil. The building's evil reputation lingers. Beasts put in it never do well, the previous vicar's refusal to carry out an exorcism remains a bone of contention, and Ted Coulthard's grandfather, when a boy, claimed to have encountered the Devil in person, sitting on the roof-tree and singing to himself (the best tunes, presumably).

One of the questions the book raises is whether the fault is in people's stars or in themselves. The debate's terms are outlined in the original discussion between Rowan, Peter, Ted and Mr Tranter. Is the building itself cursed or is it the choices people make with respect to it which causes things to go awry?

The light, up-beat tone of the chapter – it's the start of the holidays, Christmas is coming – is sustained even through the intended bombshell of Miss Keith's letter regarding the row about the twins, the match and the Play.

On which topic, Madame Orly's devastating comment that the twins had obviously shown greater artistic integrity than Miss Keith, so she should stop complaining, will never stop being funny.





This is a darker chapter than the first in several ways, only lifted in the last pages by the hustle and bustle of the others' arrival from Kingscote.

Forest paints an evocative picture of how the room above the Old Shippen looks at dusk. Furthermore, all the bits Peter choses to save from "the Viking's funeral" he makes of the junk are evocative of death: tropical butterflies pinned to cards, blown birds' eggs and a heap of antique swords and pistols.

Given Peter's spotty record with guns (series bag to date: one Kontenadmiral (intended); one goshawk (emphatically not)), his pointing the pistols nonchalantly down the stairs and firing them in the hope they're loaded makes my blood run thick with cold, especially with Daks running loose about the place (how on earth would Nicola have explained that to Esther???).

In a throwaway line, we learn that Trennels was built out of the proceeds of slavery (So far as fic goes, so far as I know only [livejournal.com profile] ankaret in her brilliant piece Sugar has tackled this aspect of Marlow history).

Finally, Peter discovers farm logs in a trunk, going back at least to the 17th century (any historian want to comment about the plausibility of the ease with which Peter deciphers the older entries?) He learns of an ancestor, Malise, who broke with his family and rode away on his 16th birthday "to serve the Man of Blood Charles Stuart."

Peter immediately identifies with Malise – his support for the loner, the rebel, trumps even his natural political inclinations (he's been a Parliamentarian since the first term of prep school, at least) and ignores the heartbreak of a family at war with itself. "O Absalom my son my son" is a cry of loss ringing across the ages, but falls, as far as Peter is concerned, on closed ears.

This book is the one with the most direct references to TMATT, so the echoes of the last time Peter found ancestral papers in a trunk are almost certainly intentional (there's even the "By Watch and Ward"/"Under Two Flags" thematic link of discarded, out-dated, jingoistic juvenile fiction.)

Lieut. Foley, too, identified with an ancestor who set himself apart from his community: Fabian the wrecker. It's an unsettling parallel, underscored when the sovereigns Peter thought he'd found on a beam turn out to be unused farthings.

"Fairy gold" is his immediate assumption, not his own will to believe causing him to overlook the direct evidence of his senses. Nicola, though, sees and appreciates the farthings for what they are, rather than what delusion turns them into.






The third chapter is almost as long as the first two put together and packed. It's at first kaleidoscopic (the vivid economy with which Forest gets Christmas over is breath-taking) and then slows down as Nicola re-encounters Patrick, is forced to face the prospect of hunting as well as fears about keeping hawks over the winter (Patrick is his normal tactful self about how she's been managing to date: "They say's the worst thing you can possibly do") and Doris is introduced.

Doris is a great improvement on Mrs Bertie – not least because she avoids the "Miss" and "Master" forelock-tugging and also has a lively style as a raconteur. Furthermore, she's not afraid to act as the voice of authority. When, in another flashback to Lieut. Foley, Peter twists Nicola's arms up behind her back and carries on doing it after she's told him "Don't , Peter. You're hurting" only Doris's decisive intervention stops it from going – where? It's an unexpectedly unsettling moment.

Patrick arrives, is shown the upper room, takes to the farm log (like a duck to water) and Peter tentatively raises the topic of Malise. Patrick is about to say something when they're all interrupted by Lawrie, in a high state of agitation and crying, "it's not fair".

Which, I have to say, for once I agree on. Catkin's an equus ex machina as regards large swathes of the plot, especially the Patrick/Ginty relationship. Patrick first really meets Ginty when she's on Catkin's back – calm, confident, in control and yet needing just a little help that only he, Patrick, can supply. It does, however, make no apparent sense why the Marlow parents choose at this point to give a gift which is not only disproportionate to the family finances but to any gift ever given to any of the other seven children. All suggestions gratefully received.

Anyway, the four younger Marlows, three dogs, one merlin and Patrick colonise the room above the Old Shippen (somewhat to Peter's suppressed resentment) and, when snow shuts off other options, we get the introduction of Gondal. Which I suspect will be a major point for discussion below the line, so on this point I'll simply flag up two issues – why is Nicola, the Polar Expedition, so visibly reluctant to engage with the proposed Gondal, and how does it tie in with other indications of her exclusion elsewhere in the chapter? Secondly, does anyone fancy writing Gothic fanfic in the style of the Misses Ramsey?



General discussion points – a few that spring to mind:

Superstition – from the "X" drawn across the water to avert a quarrel to the whole business with the shippen. The Devil on the roof-tree – yes, no or on the fence?
The Marlows in transition, from holiday visitors to members of the local community.
Rowan, working side by side with Ted Coulthard and Mr Tranter: can we say the relationship modelled here is, "Wet behind the ears but promising junior officer, very senior NCOs"?
Peter's character – bearing in mind earlier questions about Peter's judgement (of himself and others, and of situations). How does his obsession with Malise tie in? What about the Foley parallel?
Ginty and Patrick. Patrick and Nicola. Wedges, exclusion, serially monogamous friendships and awkwardness.
The Brontes as filtered through Marlow consciousnesses – a match made in Hell?
Gondal – again, so far as we've got, what issues are already developing? Do the hidden agendas (of Ginty, identifying with Emily Bronte, of Peter, identifying with Malise, of Lawrie, just wanting to act at any price) complement or conflict?

Anything else? Have at it!

Date: 2014-09-28 08:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] schwarmerei1.livejournal.com
The person writing our letter should definitely ask the specific question about Ginty riding Catkin out of the horse box. We want to come across as complete nutjobs hung up on one detail and thereby drawing a sweeping conclusion. Don't we?

;-)

Date: 2014-09-28 08:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sprog-63.livejournal.com
OK, bad idea, perhaps we don't ask!! Laughing 'til my tummy hurts at your responses though!!

Date: 2014-09-28 09:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ethelmay.livejournal.com
I should think she would like being asked, actually. I would if it were me.

Date: 2014-09-28 09:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] schwarmerei1.livejournal.com
Yes, I was being facetious, but I think a self-deprecating letter wouldn't be objectionable. She might even be amused.

I know I always like getting a comment on a old fanfic!

Date: 2014-09-29 08:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jackmerlin.livejournal.com
Yes, being serious now, she might be rather pleased to know that her friend's works are still being read, loved and discussed even though the world of childrens' literature seems to have forgotten them.
She has a website, doesn't she? Perhaps there's an email address.

Date: 2014-09-29 08:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] schwarmerei1.livejournal.com
We can even have a Kingscote-style roleplay at writing the letter collaboratively! ;-)

Date: 2014-09-29 11:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] antfan.livejournal.com
Maybe we can also ask her whether somebody (Nicola) who has done their first ever jump, involuntarily, during half term, would then be going hunting at Christmas, having apparently never jumped anything again between times?

Also shouldn't all those horses be getting a bit more exercise, even with the hard ground and the snow? Or do we reckon they do that at the start of each day, only we never hear about it?

Date: 2014-09-29 09:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jackmerlin.livejournal.com
Not to mention Peter and Lawrie who are expected to go out hunting, having not ridden regularly since when? Never in the books. Maybe Lawrie has at school, though not since the move to Trennels. And Peter wouldn't have been riding at Dartmouth, would he?

Date: 2014-09-30 07:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scarletlobster.livejournal.com
Must admit I had wondered about the exercise bit. Somewhere (can't remember which book) Patrick says something about Buster having been taken out walking, so he's not in bad condition. 'The farm horses', as far as we can see, only ever get used to plough a difficult bit of field, which would surely only happen, at most, twice and probably once a year. And who exercises Idiot Boy and Catkin during the - what? - 40 weeks? that their owners are away?

Date: 2014-09-30 07:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jackmerlin.livejournal.com
Fred Studdart does the Marlows' ponies and the Merricks have a groom, whose name I forget. The ponies probably get turned out to grass for the first few weeks of term, then the grooms will do roadwork on them to have them fit and ready for when the children come home. If the ponies are too small, or the groom too heavy to ride them, they will be led off another horse, but at the ages the children are, their ponies would be of a size that could be written by adults.
As for the farm horses, the moving timeline has made them an anomaly in the later books, but in the immediate post-war period they were probably being used quite a bit. Even then, they might be quite old horses, superseded by the tractors and perhaps semi-retired?

Date: 2014-09-30 10:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] antfan.livejournal.com
Sorry it's jumping ahead a bit, but I've been reading chapter 9 which does throw some light on this in that it says Ginty goes for a ride alone leaving her mother "to infer that she and Peter and Nicola, possibly Patrick, would be riding together as usual" - so presumably they must go out a bit?

But - the book also talks about them starting Gondal at 9.30 each morning. Doesn't quite seem to fit. And chapter 9 also mentions that Catkin is full of pent up energy because she has been neglected for Gondal.

Hmm, still leaves the rather odd impression that the Marlows can immerse themselves in their obsessive role-playing while their ponies are conveniently on hand still for jumping five bar gates hunting when required, despite their owners' lack of experience.

Dramatically, though, it does work much better that way in my opinion than the constant excursions of Falconer's Lure...the horse bits in Peter's Room definitely have impact. Just not very realistic.

Date: 2014-09-30 01:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scarletlobster.livejournal.com
yes, very good point about the time delay. I can't remember if there is any mention of the farm horses in the later books, but they were probably best forgotten by then.

Do we ever hear of Karen riding? I can't remember.

Date: 2014-09-30 04:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ethelmay.livejournal.com
Only the bit already discussed where she's said to ride quite well. I don't think she's ever shown riding.

Profile

trennels: (Default)
Antonia Forest fans

October 2021

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17 181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 29th, 2025 03:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios