[identity profile] jackmerlin.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] trennels
Thank you to Lilibulero for letting me have a go at the wheel of the Readthrough. The Ready-Made Family is my favourite Forest book. I love the dynamics of a large family with an 'intruder' in their midst. So such as they are, here are my musings.
I tried to put in the lj cuts so it didn't all show at once, but for some reason they haven't worked!

To Meet The Dodds.

The chapter opens with Peter and Nicola reunited and having a conversation which is both very funny but also ominous at times, such as Selby’s witty but unfunny quote from Hamlet – the funeral baked meats furnishing forth the wedding feast. (As a slight aside, I wonder if Nicola is inspired by this remark to go and read Hamlet, because by Cricket Term she does know something of Hamlet.) Then they imagine if all of the girls had been bridesmaids and Edwin had to buy them all presents – a delighful but daunting idea for any future spouse. Then the funniest pair of lines – ‘ d’ you think there was a ghastly pause after Kay said And there’s another seven at home?’ ‘There was a gruesome ghastly pause after Kay said he’s forty-one with three children,’ – a reminder that neither party in this marriage is facing an ideal situation or an easy time.
Finally Peter points out to Nicola the painful truth that Patrick and Ginty are likely to be wrapped up in each other, and Nicola realises ‘that however certain you may be in your own mind of the truth of some disagreeable fact, it only becomes real when someone else … confirms it for you.’
So the Dodds are finally arriving and Mrs Marlow can’t meet them herself because she needs to wash her hair. Really? I thought ‘washing one’s hair’ was the classic excuse for not going out on a date you didn’t want to go on. Mrs Marlow asks Ginty to go, only Ginty is at her most unlikeable in this book, a self-centred and vain teenage brat. When Mrs Marlow gives up on Ginty with the comment that she doesn’t want the Dodds to feel unwelcome, Ginty is both ‘relieved but resentful’. This is such a true depiction of the teenage mind – Ginty doesn’t actually want to put herself out doing a job for someone else, but neither does she want her mental self-image to be of a mean, unfriendly person.
Both Peter and Ann show their understanding of the awfulness of this whole situation in different ways. Peter thinks as the train comes in ‘This is a very grotty happening. Someone should have stopped it.’ Indeed, but who? And Ann says sorry to Rose, meaning she is sorry that Rose’s parents have divorced, her mother has died and that she has had to leave her home and come and live with strangers. Imagine if the whole book was written from Rose’s point of view – it would be hard for any modern critic to complain that the story was all about privileged children. Rose’s story could be the entire plot of a Jacqueline Wilson book.
I love Nicola and Peter meeting the Dodds. We see them both at their best, I think, especially Peter thinking of buying the sweets to make them feel welcome. Peter is natural and easy with Fob who instinctively latches onto him. And then when Mrs Clavering is pulled onto the platform by Rose, Peter is quite masterful and assertive in insisting she comes to tea, while still being polite and charming and funny – possibly glimmers of officer material showing through.
Nicola and Peter are both obviously naturally ‘good with’ younger children. I wonder if, having always been ‘lower orders’ themselves, they find it enjoyable being ‘upper deck’ in turn. They are now being ‘Giles’ and ‘Rowan’ to versions of their younger selves. (Although I’m sure Peter will be far more kind and consistent with Fob than Giles was with Nicola.)
Chas is an immensely likeable child. The conversation he and Nicola have while walking home from the station is so well written. Chas has had both unthinkable things happen to him – parents divorcing and his mother dying, and he doesn’t have a clue really about what happens next. AF makes him so calm and resigned about it all, even though his questions make Nicola’s heart lurch. AF’s characterisation is so good, we have only just met Chas, and yet we already care about what happens to him, and it’s all done without a trace of sentimentality or ‘ickiness’.


Tea And Stables.

What do we make of Mrs Clavering? The Marlows and their mother whole-heartedly approve of her. From what we see of her at tea, it seems unfair to think that she would really have been turning the children against Edwin. Has Kay been encouraging Edwin to worry about something that hasn’t actually been happening?
Tea is a successful meal, and afterwards the children are ordered outside by Mrs Marlow for a walk which ends up with everyone except Rose enjoying themselves in the stable yard. Into this scene rides Ginty who proceeds to career across the yard and nearly crush Rose in the doorway. Ginty could perfectly well get off Catkin and hold him at the entrance to the yard until the others are out of the way, but with her head full of thoughts of Patrick she has to show off in front of her earthbound siblings. And why is Catkin so excitable when he has supposedly been out riding all afternoon? I suspect he and Blackleg have been tied up somewhere while Ginty and Patrick gaze into each others eyes, pretending to be Rosina and Rupert. Nicola, quick thinking and resourceful, rescues Rose: a forerunner of what is to come later in the book.
Ginty’s news that the Idiot Boy is for sale confirms for Nicola that Ginty and Patrick have been riding together, and as she usually does when upset, goes off on her own to fetch more sugar, firmly telling herself not to care – saying ‘ “Well – so what?” to herself at intervals.’ It reminds me of the time she had to repeat Sprog’s name over and over.
One of the themes of this book is Nicola maturing. In the conversation with her mother after Mrs Clavering leaves, she seems very young, and at her most Lawrieish. Her mother points out that Mrs Clavering’s daughters have been killed, and Nicola says ‘People don’t mind, do they, not as much, when they get older?’
While waiting for Edwin to arrive the conversation turns to the Idiot Boy and surprisingly Mrs Marlow tells them they can cash their savings to buy him. Has the stress of the wedding made her so distracted that she doesn’t care if two of her children who can’t even ride very well spend a serious amount of money on a pony? And the unfairness of Ginty getting Catkin is brought up yet again.
Finally the dreaded moment arrives, and Edwin is introduced, AF gives us a far more detailed description of his physical appearance than she usually does for any character. Is she making it clear that Karen hasn’t been swept away by good looks? And then the chapter closes; with a splendid economy of words, AF gives us the forbidding sentence: ‘It was no good. They didn’t take to him at all.’

Wedding And Breakfast.

Although the book is referencing ‘Persuasion’ throughout, the wedding reminds me very much of the wedding scene in ‘Jane Eyre’. It is early morning, the church is empty and gloomy and the clothes are drab. Nicola’s reflection over the point in the ceremony where the vicar asks if there are any reasons why the couple should not be wed, and Nicola wonders if anyone ever had, seems to suggest that someone should be stopping this wedding. Has Nicola read Jane Eyre or has she been put off the Brontes for life by the Gondalling?
Patrick, you complete b******. Couldn’t you even acknowledge your former best friend with a smile instead of staring gormlessly at Ginty? That would just be ordinary politeness, as Mrs Marlow might say.
A comic touch is provided by Ginty’s fantasies about clothes – something floaty and black laceish – really? In a church? And then imagining marrying Patrick in the Merrick’s chapel. Oh dear.
The family gather outside the church to see the couple off. The sense of resentment at an intruder making off with one of the family is perfectly expressed by the collective ‘stiffening’ at Edwin calling Kay ‘Katie’. Karen now has a life and a persona which excludes all of them, and even if they liked Edwin, they would still feel that sense of displacement.
Back home for a hearty breakfast, and I do enjoy the descriptions of Chas eating. What is it about small boys with huge appetites that makes them so charming? And the family disperse for the day. Ginty again kicks up a fuss about being asked to do something.
Is Ginty just being a teenager? Because I can’t help wondering, given how opalescent her character is, if spending all her time with Patrick is causing her to reflect Patrick’s personality – self-absorbed, arrogant, single-minded?
It could also be said that Patrick and Ginty are mirroring Karen and Edwin – both couples are obsessed with getting what they want, oblivious to how anybody else is affected.
Rowan in these chapters is rather ghost-like, appearing in silence at meals, and not saying anything, bearing all the weight of Trennels on her shoulders. Come on Mrs Marlow, it’s time you noticed!
The chapter ends with Nicola and Rose in the old playroom. I love the moment when Rose shuts her eyes, hoping for something magical to appear, and then, in a way, it does, with her discovery of a shelf of books that she can escape into. Rose gets to escape from all the uncertainties of her new life into these imaginary worlds, until the chapter ends on another perfectly expressed ominous note: ‘With the end of the honeymoon, however, matters were better ordered; as Rose had feared they would be.’

Date: 2014-11-29 06:33 pm (UTC)
legionseagle: Lai Choi San (Default)
From: [personal profile] legionseagle (from livejournal.com)
Judging by that rather ghastly poem by Kipling, and that equally horrific film Becoming Jane, I suspect Jane Austen as a woman in her forties was seen as someone who'd outlived her time for romance and already missed the boat by the time of her death, whereas Emily Bronte can still be a fantasy of a woman cut off who still had a chance of love and marriage. Sexist and ageist, I know, but I can't help thinking that's why the narrative is framed that way.

Date: 2014-11-30 12:02 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Oh, don't read that ghastly poem by Kipling, but do read "The Janeites." One of those examples of how Kipling can get something so right in his stories and get the very same thing so completely wrong in his poetry.

The difference may also have to do with the fact that Austen died before publishing Persuasion, which many people regard as her greatest work. There's evidence that Austen was still evolving as a writer up to the moment of her death, and so we want to know where that evolution would have taken her.

I hate-watched Becoming Jane. It was awful. Miss Austen Regrets, on the other hand, was rather good.

--Katy

Kipling reflections OT

Date: 2014-11-30 07:34 am (UTC)
legionseagle: Lai Choi San (Default)
From: [personal profile] legionseagle (from livejournal.com)
The trouble is, if you read the original Kipling collections you have each short story with its associated poem, some of which work brilliantly ("They" and "Who will return us the children" for example) and some of which just don't, and as a result The Janeites and Jane went to heaven are linked indissolubly, leaving one wondering (as so often with Kipling) how he could produce something so insightful with the one part of his mind and something so crass with the other. Personally, I wonder if the processes he describes in 'Wireless' and 'The Greatest Story in the World' aren't semi-autobiographical.

Re: Kipling reflections OT

Date: 2014-11-30 09:07 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Yes, that is the trouble, isn't it? I've been working hard to forget that stupid Jane poem, but you're right, you can't really escape reading it.

I'm sure they were semi-autobiographical; in his memoirs he writes so much about "The Daemon," and is so clearly able to differentiate between works where his Daemon was with him (Kim, the Puck books) and those where it wasn't (The Light That Failed, The Story of the Gadsbys.) Somewhere, I think maybe in a letter to Rider Haggard, he says, "we are only telephone wires."

There's "Dayspring Mishandled," too, in which Manallace gets in some way taken over by Chaucer's creative Daemon, writes his brilliant Chaucer pastiche, and then goes back to churning out potboilers.

I'd better stop before I derail this thread any further. I just love talking about Kipling.

--Katy

Re: Kipling reflections OT

Date: 2014-11-30 09:26 am (UTC)
legionseagle: Lai Choi San (Default)
From: [personal profile] legionseagle (from livejournal.com)
'Dayspring Mishandled' is another example where poem and story chime perfectly. I think he sort of got into a corner with the idea that there had to be a linked pair every time.

In an effort to drag it back on track, I'm surprised Lawrie (who has pretty canonically read 'Puck of Pook's Hill') still has a problem with Ariel. Puck has more self-determination, but he's not wildly far off Ariel in concept.

Re: Kipling reflections OT

Date: 2014-11-30 09:40 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Oh, I'd forgotten that Lawrie had read Puck of Pook's Hill. Where is it mentioned? The only Kipling references I can remember off-hand are Nicola being Stalky, Janice advising Lois to watch the wall, and Patrick talking about "In the Same Boat."

Yes, I wonder how Lawrie would have managed if the play had been A Midsummer Night's Dream and she had been given Puck to play.

Re: Kipling reflections OT

Date: 2014-11-30 09:55 am (UTC)
legionseagle: Lai Choi San (Default)
From: [personal profile] legionseagle (from livejournal.com)
I think it's mentioned somewhere in Autumn Term though I could be wrong.
I was spoilt forever for the Dream by a fab anarchic RSC/Barbican production in which Puck was a bored rock superstar of the fairy world and the fairy giving the "Either I mistake your shape and making quite;
Or else you are that shrewd and knavish sprite
Call'd Robin Goodfellow" speech all on one breath and rising pitch, with him looking bored and mouthing "yadda, yadda" culminating with her whipping out her autograph book with a high pitched squeal when Puck said "Thou speak'st aright."

I'm sure Lawrie would have loved doing something like that, had Kempe let her.

Re: Kipling reflections OT

Date: 2014-11-30 04:21 pm (UTC)
legionseagle: Lai Choi San (Default)
From: [personal profile] legionseagle (from livejournal.com)
I'm sorry I missed it. I can'y help thinking that Lawrie's "one true way" approach to parts she wants will be a detriment in her long term career, especially when she doesn't know all that much.

Re: Kipling reflections OT

Date: 2014-11-30 06:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scarletlobster.livejournal.com
Definitely. But I suppose she is still very young and has a lot of growing up to do. I should imagine an aspiring actress having a hissy fit because the director's interpretation was different from her own would have a short career. I always raise an eyebrow at Lawrie's absolute conviction that she will be a drama student at RADA, where presumably there have always been 100 applicants for every place.

Re: Kipling reflections OT

Date: 2014-12-03 07:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sue marsden (from livejournal.com)
Does she think that though? She say in Attic Term that there is only one way to play the Shepherd Boy but 'not like Calliban'

Re: Kipling reflections OT

Date: 2014-12-04 09:11 am (UTC)
legionseagle: Lai Choi San (Default)
From: [personal profile] legionseagle (from livejournal.com)
I didn't mean "one true way" for any actor to play the part; just one true way for Lawrie to do it, and heaven help anyone else's vision of it. I'll be able to expand on this once we get onto The Cricket Term, but I saw the whole Ariel business as distinct cracks appearing in the assumption that Lawrie would go on to RADA and be a massive hit. Also, once we do the two historicals, compare and contrast with Nicholas.

Re: Kipling reflections OT

Date: 2014-12-01 07:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] intrepid--fox.livejournal.com
What's the "in the Same Boat" reference? I don't know Kipling as well as Crommie would surely feel I ought to, and that one passed me by.

Re: Kipling reflections OT

Date: 2014-12-01 09:36 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
It's the story that Patrick brings up at the end of Peter's Room, when he's trying to explain how the end of the Gondal feels. It's a story about a man who's been having a series of really horrible panic attacks, or something of that nature, and has been self-medicating his way through them with opiates. The story turns sort of weird - he meets a woman with the exact same kind of neurosis, and it turns out there's a semi-supernatural explanation for it all - but the relevant passage comes from his description of the particular horror of the attacks. "Suppose you were a violin-string--vibrating--and some one put his finger on you? As if a finger were put on the naked soul!" And there's another comparison, later, to someone stopping a finger-bowl from humming.

--Katy

Re: Kipling reflections OT

Date: 2014-12-01 11:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] intrepid--fox.livejournal.com
Ah, yes, right. Thanks.

Profile

trennels: (Default)
Antonia Forest fans

October 2021

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17 181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 1st, 2025 03:51 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios