Cricket Term, chapters 10-12
Feb. 6th, 2015 11:01 pmChapter Ten: The Play
Everyone disperses from the Hall, and Nicola once again conceals her feelings sufficiently to congratulate Lawrie, explain what's going on, and show her prize to Rose and Chas. Latimer is 'quizzically scolding' with Kay, who then starts chatting happily to Latimer's don. Who had remembered Karen apparently with pleasure at the prize-giving, so presumably not as someone who was unable to cope with the work at Oxford? And Chas invents a saying 'Lawrie is Lucky, but Nicola is Nicer'. True?
Then Miranda comes to ask Nicola to have dinner with her father. As
Which Forest does not describe, jumping straight to afterwards and the audience's impressed reactions. Not just Nicola; Rowan agrees it 'really did have something', talking to Jan. Who makes a wholly characteristic unobtrusive exit. Nicola asks about her parents, and Rowan points out that the absence of a mother might not be 'clean and tidy' - another moment of learning.
Chas enjoyed the Play, with the 'pirates', and Rose didn't, finding it frightening, and feeling sorry for Caliban. "'There just are people like that and you can't like them-' Like Marie Dobson." What do people think of this as where Nicola's thoughts on Marie end up?
Finally, Mrs Marlow gets a chance to talk to Nicola, and tell her about Miss Keith's characteristic letter, and that she'd consulted Rowan and Karen about what to say about leaving Kingscote. And on her way back to school, encountering Miss Cromwell, finally a chance to unburden her conscience about the missed lesson. Cromwell and Miss Keith have tried, it turns out, to speak to Meg Hopkins's father - 'from time to time' implies to me that they've been doing it for a few years. But no information on who would have got the Prosser if Lawrie hadn't; and suddenly Nicola doesn't care any more.
Which at least means that she isn't joining miserable Lawrie and Ginty. Ginty exceptionally put out because she has been missing out on all the positive attention she thinks should have been hers, and Lawrie because of Caliban. And her prize being a facsimile First Folio, so Nicola suddenly makes the connection with Mask of Apollo and Crommie's conversation, and 'Richard Burbadge'. So when Lawrie offers swops 'for the separate kind and your share of The Idiot' she says yes, 'giving up without regret something she no longer much wanted'. I love the bits about Marlow family swopping rules (though I do wonder what Nicola would have done when she realised how much 'the separate kind' would cost); once agreed you can't take it back. And Lawrie bursts into tears over Caliban and accidentally reveals her bargain with Them to Nicola and they all go quarrelsomely to bed.
Chapter Eleven - The Cricket Final
But before the final, the Diving Cup, and Nicola refusing this time to hold Ginty's locket. Leaving her feeling guilty when Ginty, 'patently nervous and off form', comes seventh. Superstition again; having picked Terry Hunt and Monica to win, Nicola worries that she had better take her evil eye elsewhere so as not to make Lois lose. I do feel sorry for Ginty when her friends can't leave her alone about not winning the Cup, and can quite see why she invents something to put them off the scent, though still feel that suggesting she tried to give it up to Monica is fairly awful. 'It might have been better if she'd cried.'
I love the moment with Lower IV.A and Janice not wishing each other luck, and the heroic chorus. Meanwhile Lois attempts to set up her usual alibi with a pulled muscle, and Val has yet another weep over leaving school. I am always a bit suprised at the notion of Val on demos; it doesn't fit my preconceptions of her at all, but perhaps that's just not wanting especially to share a banner with her.
Nicola choosing the team, and Lawrie being reassuring about putting them in as openers. And the 'never explain, never apologise' quote - which I think we've discussed before, and which the internet says has been attributed to many people, including Disraeli and Jowett.
And finally the match starts, and Lois is bowling to Nicola, hard and straight. 'Giles's bowling must have been even more so, but at least there had been nothing personal behind it.' But Gina French starts to let the byes pile up, and Janice is no worse than Nicola, and the runs begin to come. Nicola makes a very respectable 39, and then Pomona and Berenice manage to stick at the end, and cause Lois and Janice endless trouble getting them out - as commentators often say, bowling out tail-enders is a special skill. Lois isn't prepared to admit this or stop trying to get a last wicket, and in the end Janice lures Berenice out. Two hours to score 106 runs; no indication of over-rate.
After tea, Lois and Jan in to bat, and Nicola bowling, gets Jan caught & bowled; lucky, but lucky because she has trained herself and her team to go after everything possible. And a second wicket at the end of the over - but after that Lois starts to score, and at 40 for 2 Nicola brings Esther on. Nothing can happen, and suddenly it does; Cathy out, Gillian Hendry, Gina French. 'It was Lawrie's catch, it was stupendous, it was fantastic' and Esther has a hat-trick. I love the way Forest gets the rhythms of cricket, and the way that excitement can come out of nowhere like this. And the line 'petrified by success, Esther's remaining balls could have been safely hit by an energetic seven-year-old.'
As the rabbits come out to the crease Lois is extremely clear that she wants to do all the batting. And is closing in on the target when Val Longstreet comes in and finds herself facing the bowling by mistake. What do people think about Nicola feeling she can't 'sling down some fast ones or dolly Val out as she'd dollied Gin'? Lawrie takes the next over, and Nicola runs to save the boundary, gets the ball and turns to throw, and Lois has come back for the third but Val hasn't. 'Mr Tallboy, thought Nicola, almost an invocation, as her arm went back. The ball bounced and took the leg bail: and Val was scuttling desperately still.'
I love this moment for so many reasons, including of course the obvious Defeat of Lois, but also the way it invokes, not merely Murder Must Advertise, but Rowan and Nicola's conversation at the beginning of the book, and Rowan's advice that Nicola has followed to success, including most especially the fielding practice, without which this could not happen. An invocation is just right.
And Lois sits in the Sixth sitting room and plays again and again the moment when she tried to get Val to run, 'and after that, the three runs still hers for the making-'. I think one of the obvious contrasts here is Nicola's ability to accept that she didn't get the Prosser. Interesting that she never turns up for Old Girls events in the future. What did happen to Lois Sanger?
Chapter Twelve - Breaking-Up
The last day of term, and Nicola can savour the Cricket Cup and not having to leave Kingscote. 'The long hour of Mark Reading' does sound pretty miserable, but does include being awarded the Cricket Cup and resisting the urge 'to turn and hold it high'. Set-up for Attic Term with the news that equable Miss Carter will be going away for a year and be replaced by Mrs Lambert. And Edwin's letter - Nicola not wanting to read it in case it's news that Nicholas is dead, but instead 'N writes that he is married to Bess Burby', ie Burbage. (Reading this now, I am finally thinking 'Ark Royal AND Burbage' - but, perhaps because they are at each end of the book, it's never bothered me before. And somehow it works that each twin has a connection to Nicholas.)
Nicola runs to find out, and Janice tells her who Burbage was. But first offers her assessment of the Prosser decision - that Lawrie was 'a useful gimmick' to help other parents accept it going to the same family twice running. And - bearing out Miranda's comment that Jan notices Nicola more than other people - they talk about what Jan will be doing and the possibility of becoming a solicitor. And Nicola almost tells her about Nicholas, only Miranda arrives to ask for Jan's address. And despite the ironic look, Jan gives it.
The last encounter with Lois. 'In some odd way, we do rather seem to have got across one another...' It's interesting to speculate what has brought Lois to saying this - hardly an apology or even an admission of guilt, but at least an admission that things should have played out differently. (Could they? What if Lois had told the truth to the Court of Honour?)
It's hard to imagine what Kingscote will be like next term without Jan or Lois or indeed Marie Dobson.
What did happen to Lois Sanger?
Date: 2015-02-06 11:40 pm (UTC)"They could not conceive how much it mattered.
'Oh come on, Lois! It's only a game! Not a matter of life and death.'
But they were wrong."
She goes home, and dies. I generally presume she kills herself, since dying of a broken heart is rare, but she dies: Forest says so.
Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
Date: 2015-02-06 11:54 pm (UTC)But it would make sense of her making a not-quite-apology to Nicola.
Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-02-07 02:06 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
Date: 2015-02-07 03:52 am (UTC)Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
Date: 2015-02-07 09:18 am (UTC)Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
Date: 2015-02-07 09:42 am (UTC)Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
Date: 2015-02-07 09:51 am (UTC)Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-02-09 12:32 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:RE: Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-02-07 02:33 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
From:Re: What did happen to Lois Sanger?
Date: 2015-02-15 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-02-07 03:43 am (UTC)I adore the cricket final. I love that Lower IVA's luck is earned, I love that the Sixth is finally done in by Lois's character flaws, and I especially love Nicola being Nicola and totally unable to cope with the emotions of winning.
Would people have seen Nicola bowling Val as unsporting? Nicola sees it that way, and expects that everyone else would. But she's still fourteen to Val's... let's assume eighteen, so I doubt the spectators would have seen it in the same terms as Upper VB slaying the Seconds.
no subject
Date: 2015-02-07 08:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-02-07 09:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-02-07 11:42 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-02-09 08:25 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:Adam Gilchrist
From:Re: Adam Gilchrist
From:Re: Adam Gilchrist
From:Re: Adam Gilchrist
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-02-09 11:11 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Adam Gilchrist
From:Re: Adam Gilchrist
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-02-11 12:02 am (UTC) - Expandno subject
Date: 2015-02-07 04:31 am (UTC)Belatedly, and apologies if this was previously discussed, my internet is too poor to go back and check, why can't Nicola have Lower IVa in the cup AND be on the Prospects list? Surely if she gets them further on she's even more worthy of extra coaching herself?
no subject
Date: 2015-02-07 08:05 am (UTC)Val
Date: 2015-02-07 08:49 am (UTC)Which ties in with two other things, actually; first, I think that explains Nicola's sympathy in the match and it sort of links her to Ann, as someone who's appreciated more by her peers (the other Guides, in Ann's case, and Authority) than by those to whom she's in a different role.
Re: Val
From:Re: Val
From:Re: Val
From:Re: Val
From:Re: Val
From:Re: Val
From:Re: Val
From:Re: Val
From:Re: Val
From:Re: Val
From:Re: Val on demos
From:Re: Val on demos
From:Re: Val
From:Re: Val
From:Lawrie is Lucky but Nicola is Nicer.
Date: 2015-02-07 08:09 am (UTC)It's one of my favourite bits of all the books.
Re: Lawrie is Lucky but Nicola is Nicer.
Date: 2015-02-07 09:07 am (UTC)Jan's parents / Prospero.
Date: 2015-02-07 08:31 am (UTC)Presumably the mother is dead or disappeared, and the father lives a long way away - and that's a hell of a journey - but even so? I wonder if Janice didn't tell her father much about the play in letters home because either she knew he wouldn't be able to come and see her, or because she didn't want him to come and see her. I suppose I'm just wondering about her home life and her relationship with her father, and also her attitude to acting.
She was reluctant to be Prospero at the start, but is clearly very good at acting him. Having just been reading Vilette I can't help comparing her to Lucy Snowe who is pushed into acting a part in a play, surprises herself with the passion and ability she has in the part but is determined never to act again.
Re: Jan's parents / Prospero.
Date: 2015-02-07 09:24 am (UTC)We know she has at least one brother, and can quite happily contemplate working with her uncle, but I think that's all we get on her family apart from Rowan's comments.
Re: Jan's parents / Prospero.
From:Re: Jan's parents / Prospero.
From:Re: Jan's parents / Prospero.
From:Re: Jan's parents / Prospero.
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-02-07 10:03 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Jan's parents / Prospero.
From:Re: Jan's parents / Prospero.
From:Re: Jan's parents / Prospero.
From:Re: Jan's parents / Prospero.
From:Re: Jan's parents / Prospero.
From:Re: Jan's parents / Prospero.
From:no subject
Date: 2015-02-07 09:45 am (UTC)Tangent to follow, fair warning: I am very fond of Miss Cromwell as a character--I think she'd have reduced me to indignant tears when I was Lower Fourth age, but I would have loved her as an older teenager. And I like the way she seems to enjoy Miranda's cheeky remarks rather than squashing them. (On Miranda's part, this reminds me of Miss Pym's take on Beau Nash, as someone whose well-to-do family background moves to speak to her form mistress as an equal.) I had a professor in grad school who was even fiercer, or at any rate more explosive, than Miss Cromwell, but who loved it on the rare occasions when someone got up the nerve to talk back (assuming that the backtalk was accompanied by proper preparation)... .
Wouldn't somebody like to write a fic showing Cricket Term from the point of view of the staff? Miss Cromwell, Miss Kempe, even Miss Craven or Miss Latimer... I think it would be absolutely fascinating.
no subject
Date: 2015-02-07 10:09 am (UTC)-res23
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-02-07 02:14 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Miss Cromwell Insight into Nicola's AWOL
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:an Unstrange shape/favourite phrases
From:The play - absolutely stupendous?
Date: 2015-02-07 10:03 am (UTC)Re: The play - absolutely stupendous?
Date: 2015-02-07 10:23 am (UTC)I don't think Kingscote needs to be academic to pull off The Tempest - plenty of successful actors and directors are not academic. But I think the question that really matters is the directing. A lot of university student drama is awful because the directors don't know about directing, but if Kempe does know a bit, and is good at dealing with the child actors she's got, she might be able to come up with something that is pacey and engaging enough to hold the attention of an audience that isn't expecting much, especially if her leads can speak the verse reasonaby enough. Though ultimately it's school-story convention.
Re: The play - absolutely stupendous?
From:Re: The play - absolutely stupendous?
From:Re: The play - absolutely stupendous?
From:Re: The play - absolutely stupendous?
From:Re: The play - absolutely stupendous?
From:Re: The play - absolutely stupendous?
From:Re: The play - absolutely stupendous?
From:Re: The play - absolutely stupendous?
From:Re: The play - absolutely stupendous?
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-02-10 03:35 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: The play - the absence thereof
From:Re: The play - the absence thereof
From:Re: The play - the absence thereof
From:Re: The play - the absence thereof
From:Re: The play - the absence thereof
From:Re: The play - the absence thereof
From:Lemon soup
From:Re: Lemon soup
From:Re: Lemon soup
From:Re: The play - the absence thereof
From:Re: The play - the absence thereof
From:Re: The play - absolutely stupendous?
From:Re: The play - absolutely stupendous?
From:Miranda and her mother
Date: 2015-02-07 12:35 pm (UTC)Re: Miranda and her mother
Date: 2015-02-07 01:09 pm (UTC)Re: Miranda and her mother
From:Re: Miranda and her mother
From:Re: Miranda and her mother
From:Re: Miranda and her mother
From:Re: Miranda and her mother
From:Re: Miranda and her mother
From:Re: Miranda and her mother
From:Re: Miranda and her mother
From:Re: Miranda and her mother
From:Re: Miranda and her mother
From:Re: Miranda and her mother
From:Re: Miranda and her mother
From:Re: Miranda and her mother
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-02-09 11:18 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Miranda and her mother
From:Re: Miranda and her mother
From:Re: Miranda and her mother
From:Re: Miranda and her mother
From:Re: Miranda and her mother
From:Ginty's lie.
Date: 2015-02-07 01:28 pm (UTC)The Kingscote/Marlowverse code of honour seems to suggest that you should never, ever cry in public. Her friends are banging on in the most insensitive way, and unlike Nicola in EOT Ginty doesn't have helpful Janice to distract them and make them leave her alone. So in desperation Ginty blurts out the first thing she can think of, which is intended as a joke, but is suddenly taken more seriously than she meant it. She clearly feels appalled and guilty, and she still feels bad about it in Attic Term. So far, so good, I've persuaded myself to feel nothing but sympathy for her; but, I then think what would Nicola have said or done in that situation, and all my sympathy dissolves. Partly because I don't think Nicola would want to cry over having performed badly, and even supposing she did, she would deal with it quite differently.
Re: Ginty's lie.
Date: 2015-02-07 02:01 pm (UTC)Re: Ginty's lie.
From:Re: Ginty's lie.
From:Ginty's Lie
From:Re: Ginty's Lie
From:Re: Ginty's Lie
From:Re: Ginty's Lie
From:Re: Ginty's Lie
From:Re: Ginty's Lie
From:Re: Ginty's Lie
From:Sportsmanship
From:Re: Sportsmanship
From:Re: Sportsmanship
From:Re: Sportsmanship
From:Re: Sportsmanship
From:Re: Sportsmanship
From:Re: Sportsmanship
From:Re: Sportsmanship
From:Re: Ginty's lie.
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2015-02-07 02:30 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Ginty's lie.
From:Re: Ginty's lie.
From:Never explain, never apologize
Date: 2015-02-07 07:05 pm (UTC)Which would fit Nicola very well...
(Apparently in a letter to Times, 5 September 1919. Also has cross references with Disraeli "Never complain and never explain." and Elbert Hubbard "Never explain—your friends do not need it and your enemies will not believe you anyway.")
Re: Never explain, never apologize
Date: 2015-02-08 07:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-02-08 10:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-02-08 10:28 pm (UTC)The letter from Edwin
Date: 2015-02-09 07:09 pm (UTC)Re: The letter from Edwin
Date: 2015-02-09 07:23 pm (UTC)Re: The letter from Edwin
From:no subject
Date: 2015-02-09 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-02-09 09:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: