Mask of Apollo and "Restricted Books"
Mar. 28th, 2007 04:13 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I think I've asked this before and nobody came up with any suggestions, but I'm doing another edit and thought I'd try again.
Nicola gets in trouble at some point because she takes this Mary Renault novel to school with her and not only is it an extra book, and (I think) from the local library, but in the Kingscote library it's Restricted or Limited or whatever the term is. We've talked before about her take on why it should have been Restricted; and I am sad to think that it would probably still be the equivalent of Restricted in many American school libraries today.
My question was: what other books would have been restricted in an English girls' school? Books that would have been deemed suitable for the Seniors but not for the Juniors? I need something written before 1938, something that might have appealed to an adventurous 12-year-old. I need this for my own children's book, and it's the kind of thing that's impossible for a 20-year-old American RA to figure out! I thought that somebody here might have an idea, though.
Nicola gets in trouble at some point because she takes this Mary Renault novel to school with her and not only is it an extra book, and (I think) from the local library, but in the Kingscote library it's Restricted or Limited or whatever the term is. We've talked before about her take on why it should have been Restricted; and I am sad to think that it would probably still be the equivalent of Restricted in many American school libraries today.
My question was: what other books would have been restricted in an English girls' school? Books that would have been deemed suitable for the Seniors but not for the Juniors? I need something written before 1938, something that might have appealed to an adventurous 12-year-old. I need this for my own children's book, and it's the kind of thing that's impossible for a 20-year-old American RA to figure out! I thought that somebody here might have an idea, though.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 12:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 11:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 02:00 pm (UTC)(while mentioning the possibility of The Well Of Loneliness by Radclyffe Hall being a banned book perhaps? Or am I being dim? It was not allowed in our 6th form/school library and that was as late as 1995...)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 08:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-30 03:45 pm (UTC)I can well understand why her books were restricted. In fact, today I was trying to think of which one my sympathetic teacher can innocently offer my main character to read--one that's genuinely inoffensive in 1938 terms--and it was hard to come up with one. They're all full of adultery, odd episodes of nudity, drugs, and other forms of anti-social behavior (and of course lesbianism and anti-Semitism, which is off-putting even today). I'm thinking that *Nine Tailors* is pretty tame--the "adulterous" couple there didn't actually intend to not be married. As an adolescent I never picked up on any of this stuff, and I'm sure Nicola the Sayers fan didn't either, but a prurient adult would definitely have restricted those books.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-31 12:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-03-31 09:54 am (UTC)I don't remember any nudity (bar corpses) expect single-sex bathing places and Peter in his bedroom (can we infer from Mrs Ruddle's comments what height the window-frame was?), and I doubt that would have been terrible in 1938, certainly not on the level of drug-running.
Sayer's anti-Semitism would be one thing that wouldn't have got her books banned pre-WWII, because at her level it was institutionalised.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-04-02 03:59 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-03-31 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-31 09:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 10:43 am (UTC)I was particularly unimpressed as the Junior library was pretty small and full of musty old classics, but in the absence of anything else to read I read them anyway. Essentially the only suitable books were ones aimed at children; anything aimed at an adult audience wasn't there.
Thinking of adult pre-1938 books that I might have read at 12 - various Agatha Christies and other detective novels, CS Forester who wrote Hornblower had had some books published by 1938. Or Rider Haggard - She, King Solomon's Mines? I suspect John Buchan (39 Steps etc) would also have been 'too much for the little ones' despite being beloved by the Chalet School.
Also LMMontgomery's 'Rilla of Ingleside' was excluded from many libraries despite the popularity of the rest of the Anne of Green Gables series, for being too downbeat. My local library wouldn't order it for me when I was 11 or so (I found it a few years later and god it was depressing, partly because I hadn't clocked until Walter's death that this was in WWI, having assumed that the first book was very similar to my parents' upbringing in the 40s and thus Rilla should be in the late 1960s...)
no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 12:04 pm (UTC)Alternatively, how about something by Joseph Conrad?
no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 12:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 12:26 pm (UTC)Brave New World was published in 1932 but I'm not sure it would have made it into any school library in 1938.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 03:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 05:49 pm (UTC)I asked Antonia Forest if Tim Kennemore had any connection with her Tim.
Tim Kennemore is female and knew AF - I think AF was a bit of a mentor to her early in her writing career; she thought she was a gifted writer. There was no relationship and the Tim K thing is just a coincidence. I gather there was a bit of a coolness between them latterly but I don't know why.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 06:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-30 06:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-31 09:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-29 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-31 10:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-30 11:11 pm (UTC)There's a book by Arthur Marshall called "Giggling in the Shrubbery" which might (or might not) be useful to you - it's a collection of reminiscences of pre-war schoolgirls (but probably more 1920's than 1930's). It needs taking with perhaps a pinch of salt - he appears to concentrate on noticeably odd behaviour - no school could exhibit all the conditions illustrated unless run by a truly certifiable head. Anyway, the books he mentioned as being banned in various schools are: anything by Angela Brazil (that was in 1920); "Tell England", by Ernest Raymond; "Sorrell & Son", by Warwick Deeping; "Gone with the Wind", and anything by Alexander Dumas (that was in a Catholic school). Georgette Heyer was mentioned as being permitted, but it may only have been for the older girls perhaps?
no subject
Date: 2007-03-30 11:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-06 08:52 am (UTC)