Patrick's future
Sep. 19th, 2007 10:15 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I've started re-reading Falconer's Lure and came across the following snippet:
~*~*~
Patrick said suddenly, "Oh dear. I do wish it was six years from now."
"Six years?" said Nicola, who sometimes wished it was this time next week, but had never looked that far ahead.
"Yes. Well. In six years, I'll have finished school, I'll have done National Service, and if Dad's still M.P. I can come back here and look after things. And then Jon and I can keep hawkes properly.
pg 52/53 GGB edition
~*~*~
That made me wonder about how AF changed things to suit the times, yet retained some things that were already 'canon' despite them being 'out of time'.
For example, when the red uniforms came back in, the book they were mentioned in was written *past* the time rationing finished in the early 1950s in Real Life? That was Falconer's Lure as well, but haven't reached that bit in the book, yet. I know the book is set in 1948, and clothes rationing ended in 1949...but the book was written/published in 1955.
What I'm leading up to here is... will Patrick do his National Service, despite that going out before potential later books would have been written, and presumably set? Especially since it had already been mentioned that he was going to do it? Or would AF have just ignored that?
~*~*~
Patrick said suddenly, "Oh dear. I do wish it was six years from now."
"Six years?" said Nicola, who sometimes wished it was this time next week, but had never looked that far ahead.
"Yes. Well. In six years, I'll have finished school, I'll have done National Service, and if Dad's still M.P. I can come back here and look after things. And then Jon and I can keep hawkes properly.
pg 52/53 GGB edition
~*~*~
That made me wonder about how AF changed things to suit the times, yet retained some things that were already 'canon' despite them being 'out of time'.
For example, when the red uniforms came back in, the book they were mentioned in was written *past* the time rationing finished in the early 1950s in Real Life? That was Falconer's Lure as well, but haven't reached that bit in the book, yet. I know the book is set in 1948, and clothes rationing ended in 1949...but the book was written/published in 1955.
What I'm leading up to here is... will Patrick do his National Service, despite that going out before potential later books would have been written, and presumably set? Especially since it had already been mentioned that he was going to do it? Or would AF have just ignored that?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 10:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 12:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 12:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 12:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 12:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 12:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 01:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 02:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 07:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 02:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 01:11 pm (UTC)my (late) father was in the ruc and we have family friends who he met while they were over on tours of duty in the early 70s, with either the royal lifeguards or the blues and royals (can't remember for definite which, but i'm pretty sure it's the former)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 01:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 07:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 04:08 pm (UTC)The time settings didn't bother me until 'Attic Term'; probably because lumping together any time after the war wasn't a problem until the books entered my lifetime.
The biggest problem I have with the timing is that Ginty has to phone the operator to get through to Patrick and it is the operator who gives away the fact that she's been phoning every night. That didn't strike me as realistic for the 1970s.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-24 01:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 04:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 11:07 pm (UTC)However, the parents do appear to be far more old-fashioned in the early books, don't they?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-22 12:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-23 12:17 pm (UTC)In the Marlows and the Traitor, Nicola and Lawrie are still calling Mrs Marlow 'Mummy', but Ginty is changing:
"You needn't worry, Momma," said Ginty calmly, "because I shan't want one. Wings! A Christmas tree fairy is exactly what I'd feel like."
"No, Ginty. Mum is you like and must, but Momma I won't have."
"All right, Mum. And actually I've just thought what I'll be," said Ginty who didn't like acting and wasn't especially keen on dressing up."
~*~*~
The bit that interests me, there, is 'Mum if you like and must'. Do you think Mrs Marlow, from that, prefers 'Mummy'?
pg 37 Faber paperback edition
no subject
Date: 2007-09-23 08:16 pm (UTC)My own (Welsh, working-class) mum made it very clear that "mummy" had a definite sell by date!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 09:04 pm (UTC)I'd say if you're writing a story about Patrick you could legitimately
(a) have him do National Service
(b) work out when it would be following normally chronology from the end of Run Away Home and not have him do National Service
or (c) follow AF's own style and set your story in 2007. In which case no National Service.
In my post-RAH story, I chose none of these because I wanted to have the Falklands War play a part so that fixed my timeline.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-20 09:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-20 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 11:10 pm (UTC)I wonder if he'd do some sort of education in Ag to help towards eventually taking over the family property.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-26 10:35 pm (UTC)