The Thuggery Affair
Oct. 10th, 2005 08:28 pmI thought people were more likely to have read it now that GGBP have had it out for a bit.
The secret language didn't bother me too much on rereading—I could decode most of it. The thing that seemed most unlikely to me was that the Thuggery must have been in the village for some time. Given that, it seems a little unlikely that Patrick and Nicola were wandering the countryside alone without any comment from the adults (and we never hear of any repercussions from the night in the haystack, either), which I think there would have been if the Thuggery had been on the loose.
What do you all think? Any other opinions on the book?
The secret language didn't bother me too much on rereading—I could decode most of it. The thing that seemed most unlikely to me was that the Thuggery must have been in the village for some time. Given that, it seems a little unlikely that Patrick and Nicola were wandering the countryside alone without any comment from the adults (and we never hear of any repercussions from the night in the haystack, either), which I think there would have been if the Thuggery had been on the loose.
What do you all think? Any other opinions on the book?
no subject
Date: 2005-10-10 08:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-11 07:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-10 09:20 pm (UTC)Think jediowl right in saying it seems a bit odd about the Thuggery being about before - I also think that the adults don't actually seem to have much opinion on them at all, apart from vaguely thinking they're responsible for things. No-one seems to really consider them a real threat to anything, more as a convenient local scapegoat.
I liked Lawrie's chicklet, especially when she found she couldn't be Sophia any more and there not being a Nicola didn't seem to bother me too much...
I think I'm not really sure yet, I'll see when I've read it again!
Like to read what others think though!
no subject
Date: 2005-10-11 09:06 am (UTC)The assumptions Peter and Patrick make about the Thuggery's activities, which are essential to the plot, seem entirely unjustified on the basis of the known facts (notwithstanding that they are correct); the other glaring plot hole as far as I'm concerned is the sheer lack of judgement displayed by Patrick and Peter in not enlisting adult help. I know they're only teenagers, but still... AF justified "keeping the adults out" much better, i.e., entirely credibly, in Run Away Home.
The lack of Nicola isn't a particular problem for me, much as I like her, and there some great bits in there (see
no subject
Date: 2005-10-11 07:47 pm (UTC)Run Away Home's lack of adults works, I think, because of Giles and Rowan, who are adults, but young enough to take Edward's side and run insane risks for him.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-11 11:18 am (UTC)I also thought it rang odd that the Thuggery hadn't been mentioned, but decided that since I was willing to suspend disbelief to allow all the books happen in the space of 18 months (or whatever it is), I'd give a bit of slack on that one too! :-)
no subject
Date: 2005-10-11 07:22 pm (UTC)