[identity profile] vilakins.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] trennels

I have now read all the modern-day Marlow books I can lay my hands on, which is all but The Marlows and the Traitor (which I remember quite well from when I was 11 or so) and The Thuggery Affair (which I gather is no great loss).

I love these books and mourn the lack of any more. In fact: sorrow! I will probably read the Player ones on the strength of them. The characters are so well drawn and well understood and not always likeable either, which makes them feel very real (except for Giles whom I dislike for being so arrogant and full of himself--and unkind in Autumn Term; I hope he never marries) and I also like how we see a part of their lives with so much more having happened and about to. We'll never know what happened between Nicola and Esther when she went back to school, or how Judith recovered from Edward running away, or how Kay coped with her family, and after all, RL is untidy like that too.

Does anyone know whether AF had any plans for future books and what would have happened in them?

The one thing I find jarring in the books is the very obvious placement of each in a different time and often decade. Why did AF feel it was necessary? The mention of the war in the earlier ones is part of them and places them, as does Ginty having to go through an operator to phone London, but apart from that a reader could, if allowed to, imagine the books to be set in their own era; country life and boarding school haven't changed much. Kingscote in the 50s wasn't much different to my school decades later. So I find gratuitous references to the Beatles, Up Pompeii, punks, Morecombe and Wise etc not just jarring but unnecessary to the story and Pastede On. If the Marlows were watching TV without the programme being mentioned, I would just keep reading, but mention a specific programme for no reason and I stop in my tracks, disconcerted.

The deliberate insertion of current slang feels odd too, or is it just because it's no longer current? Did people really call clothes 'gear' back in the 70s? OTOH I do love what I assume is specifically Marlow family slang like natch, trimmensely (both of which I used as a kid), and sorrow. Come to think of it though, 'sorrow' can't be a Marlowism because Patrick says it too.

I'm curious about Peter's dreadful nickname of Binks. How do you get that from Peter? Is it a baby name they keep on calling him? I'm totally with him on his objections to it, but the others persist in using it. Is it some sort of common baby name in England that might stick? My mother had a friend called Bunty and I could never understand how she put up with it. [shudders]

Date: 2008-06-28 12:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robincarmody.livejournal.com
I think a lot of people at the time *did* use slang words while otherwise speaking in very RP accents (far more traditionally RP than today) - that's one of the most interesting things about seeing archive footage of middle-class young people in the 1960s/70s, the almost shapeshifting nature of their speech and mannerisms.

The headmaster of Marlborough College (one of the main fee-paying schools in the UK) commented about the changing accents and speech patterns of his pupils, and the drift towards a "classless" accent, as early as November 1965 (the same year as 'The Thuggery Affair'), and he significantly went on to comment that when they spoke to their elders they still used the traditional public school accent - they had effectively developed two languages, whereas only four years earlier, at the time of 'Peter's Room', they would probably still have used the older public school accent *all the time*, including amongst themselves.

Date: 2008-06-28 02:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robincarmody.livejournal.com
I can tell you that the US intonation is also often heard now among British teenagers: the dominant tone, even in my part of the south-west, seems to be half-Basildon (a new town in south-east England: google "Estuary English" for the full context), half-Southern California.

I do get the impression that the main trend in Aus/NZ/Canada in recent decades has been a breaking of ties with the UK and its replacement by the US as a cultural model for the new generations. I get the feeling that most young people in those countries probably now see the UK as a played-out fossil nation and, if they're of British descent, can't understand why their parents and grandparents still relate to it.

Date: 2008-06-28 03:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robincarmody.livejournal.com
If by the UK breaking the ties you mean our entry into what is now the EU 35 years ago, I must admit I support that and would regard myself as fundamentally European - though I would certainly not support restrictions on New Zealanders coming to the UK (I don't support restrictions on international travel unless I think there is a very good reason, and there isn't in this case).

"Fossil nation" was an exaggeration. That's more a US perception of Britain than a Commonwealth one, I suppose.

re. your eligibility to live in Israel: dare I ask how you view what has always struck me as AF's antipathy to her Jewish roots? (that is of course assuming that you have such roots as well: you may not)

Date: 2008-06-28 06:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] richenda.livejournal.com
>>>>I'm not sure what was involved in Vatican 2 apart from having services in the local language, but I can see a very aloof English boy like him preferring tradition to the new

Much more to it than that! For instance, one of the reasons that the "old Mass" was allowed was that Vatican 2 emphasized the importance of the bishops responding to the laity, and the Vatican responding to the bishops - hence the recent importance of the National Councils of Bishops and national Councils of Priests
Also, Second Vatican emphasized the special relationship between Jews, Muslims and Christians, which makes it very odd that a Jewish convert (AF) was so opposed to it. (A friend of a friend knew her, and has said and written that AF was very pre-Vatican 2. I haven't direct knowledge of that.)

Date: 2008-06-28 06:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] richenda.livejournal.com
Yes, I'm Catholic, but not upper class!
My family (I'm the only survivor)was CPO/estate management, rather than Marlow (Navy commission/family farm, although there was once a family farm.
My name comes from the Quakers who founded a computer group in the 1970s, and my lifelong admiration of the Northrepps/Gurneys/Frys etc

Date: 2008-06-28 07:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] richenda.livejournal.com
I don't know if they invented the name, but it was a family name in the huge network of Quaker Frys, Gurneys,Barclays etc whose family home was Northrepps in East Anglia
The children's writer Rachel Anderson, daughter of Verily Anderson, is a descendant of that network. i don't think that she's Quaker herself - could be wrong - but her Quaker background sows in her wonderful books for children that deal with war refugees and learning difficulties. She has an adopted son who is a Vietnamese survivor and also has learning difficulties.

Date: 2008-06-28 06:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] richenda.livejournal.com
>>>sneers at Nicola's riding,

But does he sneer? Isn't that in his Rupert persona?
I know that he advises against her buying (is it Catkin in a previous book to the actual purchase for Ginty?) but isn't that simply realistic advice? We're told elsewhere that Lawrie's riding is better than Nicola's - by Lawrie herself, but I don't think that N argues the point
Also - my little bit of fantasy on this point - Hornblower doesn't ride well, and N admires him, so she might well make a point of not concentrating on her riding?

Date: 2008-06-28 04:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alliekiwi.livejournal.com
Yes, when the UK joined the EEC, that had a significant impact on our export market. We sent meat and dairy products to Britain - it was what we'd always done, it was virtually why we existed in the first place, in a way. We practically beggared ourselves in WW2 sending food and supplies. We continued to send supplies to the UK post-war as well under 'Food for Britain' appeals which lasted until 1950. Until 1949-ish there was no such thing as a NZ nationality - you were British, even if you were born here. (Same went for Canada and Australia etc - they were 'British', too, by nationality.)

So the EEC thing with the UK was a huge mindset - and economic hurdle - to get over.

I suppose when you feel fundamentally 'European' the fact that people so far away felt that they had some sort of claim on the UK must seem odd.

Date: 2008-06-28 06:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] richenda.livejournal.com
>>>I imagine that was the result of TV, and even more so now

And radio - radio Luxembourg and then the pirate stations - e.g. East Anglian boarding schools/Radio Caroline
I don't know if the Radio Essex re-enaction of the pirate radio stations (2003?) is still up on their website, but that would give you a flavour of what people were listening to on their "trannies" - often smuggled' sometimes reluctantly peermitted

Date: 2008-06-28 06:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrs-redboots.livejournal.com
Not just East Anglian boarding-schools - at mine, in Hampshire, the common-room radios were permanently tuned to either Radio Caroline or, more usually, Radio London (another pirate ship moored off Frinton-on-Sea!). We were not allowed private trannies, but several people smuggled them in anyway.

Date: 2008-06-28 07:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] richenda.livejournal.com
>>>>the common-room radios were permanently tuned to either Radio Caroline or, more usually, Radio London (another pirate ship moored off Frinton-on-Sea!).

Thank you - yes, of course - I've muddled - it was Radio London, not Caroline that was off Frinton.
Day girls boasted of having been in one of the cars at Frinton that signalled to the ship
But caroliiiiiiiiiine was the song that everyone associated with the pirates.

Date: 2008-06-29 04:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrs-redboots.livejournal.com
They were both off Frinton at one stage; wasn't it Caroline who slipped her anchor on one famous occasion and had to be rescued by the Walton Lifeboat?

Radio London closed down when pirate radios became illegal in the late 1960s, but Radio Caroline is, as far as I know, still going, although not from a ship moored off Frinton.

Date: 2008-06-29 06:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] richenda.livejournal.com
Radio Essex recreated a pirate ship - they moored it off the Ha'penny pier in Harwich, and had much fun, with the former DJs doing stints in the same way that they used to - and being smuggles on and off the boat as used to happen in the old days.
One day a mobile phone went off by mistake on air, and they pretended that it was a musical birthday card

Date: 2008-06-28 06:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] richenda.livejournal.com
I didn't realize that you aren't English.
My thought is that the 1960s generation of boarding school teens was probably the first to feel pressure to fit in with day school teens, but I might be wrong. because in the late 1960s I was not working in a school context.
May I friend you? Il ike the way you think and write, and I very much approve of what you say about Prince Caspian in your LJ.

Date: 2008-06-28 05:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robincarmody.livejournal.com
I think you're right to feel that way, simply because the 1960s was when the self-assertion of the mass over the elite (the single most important post-war change in Britain) really began.

Profile

trennels: (Default)
Antonia Forest fans

October 2021

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17 181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 6th, 2025 02:26 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios