Run Away Home.
Jan. 2nd, 2010 04:25 pmThought I'd give myself a Christmas treat and reread RAH. But as I read the earlier parts of the book I found myself a bit disappointed. Normally I find AF's books improve the more you read them,even The Thuggery Affair which I found I really liked second time round, (even the odd slang seems so much more believable once you've had a chance to get used to it);but RAH wasn't growing on me... Partly the whole back story to Edward Oeschli seems so unlikely and contrived. If Edward's dad was as decent as he is described as being, why would he have done something so mad as kidnapping a baby from a pram, causing massive panic and worry to the mother? OK it's a plot device to make it impossible for him to come back to England to get Edward, but it adds to the unconvincingness of the whole story. And would a young naval officer like Giles really risk everything for an unknown boy? Think how cross he was with Nicola when she bunked off school to see him in Autumn Term. And would anyone from an experienced sailing, naval family really have taken an open dayboat to sea in early January?
However I do love the sailing scenes, especially Peter sailing the boat back with Giles unconscious. Makes me want to reread 'We didn't mean to go to sea'...
However I do love the sailing scenes, especially Peter sailing the boat back with Giles unconscious. Makes me want to reread 'We didn't mean to go to sea'...
no subject
Date: 2010-01-02 07:52 pm (UTC)Still, the moment Giles knew Rowan wouldn't be sailing with him he should have chucked the idea (I do like Giles and "Rowley" in the pub, too).
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 07:29 pm (UTC)Giles in RAH
Date: 2010-06-30 05:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-02 10:40 pm (UTC)I do like all the family stuff though, the relationship between Giles and the others, Xmas in the cave etc.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 09:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 12:38 pm (UTC)Because cafes are expensive and not always around - lots of people still do it, and it was certainly what we did on days out in my 80s childhood. The intent, of course, is to eat the picnic outside, but it is never warm enough to do so.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 01:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 07:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-03 07:23 pm (UTC)I agree Giles turns out disappointingly two-dimensional now that we finally get more of him (but then again, that may not be unlike how Nicola sees him, the way she hero-worships him). But whatever RAH lacks in terms of Giles, it makes up for in terms of Rowan - she is one character we see in far greater depth and detail than in any of the previous books.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 03:50 am (UTC)There are a couple of things that bother me about RAH, in addition to those mentioned above. Firstly, Giles' failure to let Rowan et al know of the massive delay is pretty hard to believe - given that Dad was stumping up for necessary expenses, in particular. Wouldn't have been hard to arrange a phone call and / or telegram.
Secondly, Mrs Marlow's staying away so long. It's clear that she has to go when her mother's ill, and makes sense not dashing straight back, but to stay until 10th or 11th of January, when not only are her daughters back from boarding school, but Giles home on (apparently rare) leave.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 11:15 pm (UTC)And I think they have the other simplistic, slightly priggish but pragmatic attitude that she ought to have settled for marrying Felix anyway. We were closer then to the days when it was assumed you would marry the father of your baby, and the Marlows are a fairly old-fashioned lot.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 11:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 01:46 pm (UTC)Giles wouldn't only be risking his own career - he would be risking Peter's too.
i love the book - but I'm sure that we are expected to see the whole thing as misguide impetuosity
no subject
Date: 2010-01-04 01:47 pm (UTC)Other things that bother me:
1) Nicola and Patrick - she just falls back into being the docile side-kick, now that Ginty is out of the way. Per-lease! I think there would be a bit more fall out than that!
2) Ann is as two dimensional as Giles - she becomes incredibly prissy and puritanical and priggish - about religion especially. I mean refusing to lend Nicola a bike go to a RC service in Latin - I just can't see her (or any sixteen year old) acting like this. In previous books Ann had a lot more complexity/redeeming features.
3) The Dodd family - the younger Dodds become plot devices rather than characters in their own right. they did have a close relationship with the younger Marlows which recedes in this book. Edwin also having become an interesting character by the end of Ready Made Family recedes into stuffy brother-in-law.
4) In general the book feels like an unhappy amalgam of old style children-on-their-own holiday story, cricket on the beach etc with "issues" plot tacked on.
Definitely the one I would be least likely to take to my desert island!
no subject
Date: 2010-01-05 11:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-06 10:37 pm (UTC)The best thing about the book for me is Peter sailing the boat home, with Giles out cold.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-07 12:40 am (UTC)But the writing of that passage is amazing, couldn't agree more.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-07 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-08 02:01 am (UTC)Ann
Date: 2010-02-09 03:19 am (UTC)A good long chat with Madame Orly would do her the world of good. She converted, and since she continues after being widowed it must be out of conviction. A long chat with Patrick might end up in a huge argument (I doubt Patrick could be tactful where religion is concerned). I could see Ann and Patrick having a very interesting love-hate relationship.
RAH
Date: 2010-02-09 03:12 am (UTC)