What would Forest have thought...
Sep. 20th, 2010 05:12 am... of the Mass in which the Pope beatified John Henry Newman?
Or, for that matter, what would Nicola - or Patrick, or any of the others - have thought?
I should add that I'm asking this as an interested outsider who watched most of it and is eagerly awaiting discussion, but probably doesn't know enough to be able to actually contribute much.
Or, for that matter, what would Nicola - or Patrick, or any of the others - have thought?
I should add that I'm asking this as an interested outsider who watched most of it and is eagerly awaiting discussion, but probably doesn't know enough to be able to actually contribute much.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-19 10:36 pm (UTC)But what did you think?
no subject
Date: 2010-09-20 08:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-22 08:25 am (UTC)(Of course, we can't prove that this idea is correct - even if one got an audience, 'tisn't exactly the first thing you'd ask him about.)
It seems that he thinks that the modern thing of taking everything off the altar serves to promote the ego of the priest, whereas when cross and candles were all there, it created a certain invisibility and anonymity
no subject
Date: 2010-09-20 10:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-22 07:26 am (UTC)I can imagine Nicola's mystification at the whole business and see her as thinking Cardinal Newman wouldn't have liked it if he'd made so sure no-one would be able to disinter any relics. Patrick would mention the miracle as irrefutable proof that he would have been in favour and Nicola would be left feeling confused by P's logic but privately convinced of a flaw there somewhere if only she could articulate it in the teeth of his implacable belief system.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-22 08:38 am (UTC)Um. The C of E doesn't have a process, but it has created a newish calendar of memorial days, which comes fairly close to recognizing non-scriptural sainthood (as opposed to the NT "all are saints" approach).
no subject
Date: 2010-09-22 08:40 am (UTC)I can't find the reference, but his problem was that he thought that these proclamations belong to the past, and that they are obstacles to conversion. Similarly, he didn't want ex cathedra infallibitity to be proclaimed, because he foresaw the consequences we've got - that people waste intelectual energy in speculating what's ex cathedra and what isn't. Well, that's my gloss on it - sorry that I can't give a reference and if I've got rather a long way off topic from the liturgy
no subject
Date: 2010-09-22 09:19 am (UTC)Ian Ker, quoted here,was quoted severa ltimes on BBC coverage - I think he was there
http://socrates58.blogspot.com/2007/03/newman-on-papal-infallibility.html
no subject
Date: 2010-11-01 12:58 am (UTC)