Spring Term: A review
Nov. 3rd, 2011 07:20 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
1. Cover. The picture isn't bad, I suppose. Very reminiscent of the 1980's covers, featuring Ginty, Ann and a bed exactly like the ones we had at my boarding school. The text on the cover looks like it was done with MS Paint. Dreadful. It says 'Antonia Forest's Kingscote SPRING TERM' near the top and 'Sally Hayward' in smaller letters near the bottom.
2. Length. It feels longer than AF's school books (though I haven't actually checked the page counts) and it definitely needed stronger editing to tighten it up.
3. Plot. Is a mix of all AF's story elements thrown together. I don't think there's actually one new idea in the whole book. In no particular order we have: Nicola in a singing competition; Lawrie in a play with Tim directing it; Edwin with some discoveries about the farm log; Patrick and Nicola hawking together; Ginty doing something really stupid and intrusive and then getting all aggrieved when she is found out; Lawrie having to go into a B form; and the rest.
4. Characterisation. I think this is where Hayward is weakest. All her characters sound like Nicola. Now, I like Nicola, but she is not Miranda or Lawrie. She's certainly not Ann or Ginty. And so on. I didn't get any of the depth of characterisation which makes AF's writing so incredible. I didn't learn anything new about any of the characters, mostly because they don't learn anything new about themselves.
5. Prose. Is mostly okay. There are times when I longed for AF's beautiful, clear, precise use of language, but Hayward's writing is more than serviceable for the most part.
6. Setting. Is around the time of Run Away Home, rather than contemporary. Hayward explains that this was in large part for plot reasons, so that she could use letters rather than texts/emails etc. Meh.
My verdict:
It's moderately good fanfiction. It's not the best AF fic I've read, but it's far from being the worst. What it's not, in my view, is worth paying actual money for when you can read excellent fanfic online for free. I know GGBP have previously published Chalet School fic, but I hope that they are not tempted to publish any more AF fic.
Oh, I forgot to say. It's not safe to read if you have any kind of aversion to italics or exclamation marks which are liberally spread through the whole book.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 09:18 am (UTC)1. I liked the cover precisely because it was reminiscent of the eighties covers.
2. This didn't seem any longer to me than the original school books. I'm going to count pages now.
3,4,5, Good fan-fic/ continuation novels are written as a homage to the original author, you can choose whether to read them or not as you please. They are supposed to be good pastiche, not startling originality. If there were anything "new" or different to do with plot or character in the book the author would rightly be accused of making the characters do things that the original author would never have intended or approved of. I have a couple of niggles with the plot, but on the whole I found it satisfying that there was nothing in the book that hadn't been pointed to in the canon, and that all the characters' actions felt true to what we know of them.
6. What is your complaint with the setting? All of AF's books up to Thuggery Affair were set in the same post-war setting, before she then jumped to the 60s for TA; RMF and Cricket Term could be any setting as they're so family/school orientated; and Attic Term and RAH were contemporary to the time of writing. In my opinion the least successful of the Marlow books are the ones that jumped into the future (TA, AT and RAH) - I think the Marlows in the mid- eighties stretch my suspension of disbelief and I don't think even AF could have brought them into 2011.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 09:39 am (UTC)But I do think that if you are going to publish a book and sell it to people, it will be held to higher standards than online fanfic. As a book, I think this is weak.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-06 08:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 09:26 am (UTC)Does the author know how much ponies cost? If Lawrie hadn't paid Nicola for the half of the Idiot Boy that she swapped for the Folio, how did Nicola have enough savings left to buy another pony? And Peter couldn't have just given Lawrie his half for a record token! I'm sure the Marlow parents would have insisted on Lawrie paying both of them back from her own Savings Bonds or whatever it was that they had.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-05 12:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-21 03:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 10:13 am (UTC)I don't think the cover is much cop, to be honest. It is quite reminiscent of the 80s covers as you say but it's not great drawing.
Overall I agree with
I think that when I started the book I would have agreed more with your overall comments, but from at least half-way I found myself utterly gripped, couldn't put it down, laughed out loud at several bits, and when I finally finished I felt like I'd read an actual AF book that mostly gave me what I wanted.
There is some fanservice, particularly for Nick/Patrick shippers of course, and I think Ginty gets stomped on pretty hard. I don't mind those aspect personally but I do think those aspects are more fannish and less AFish.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-05 12:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-06 08:24 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:cover
Date: 2011-11-14 11:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 10:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-05 12:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 10:45 am (UTC)My main criticism was that there seemed to be so much stuffed into the plot. I'm not sure there was a character in canon who didn't get a mention. Of course, the compulsion to explain how everything worked out for everyone is understandable in writing this kind of follow-on: AF had the luxury of knowing that she could pick up on a theme or a character in the next book. The inclusion of Selby, for example, was completely wasted - it could have been used to throw an interesting sidelight on someone's character, but wasn't.
I was happy with the early 80s setting: as jackmerlin says, I just can't see the Marlows, or even Kingscote, in 2011; and the contortions to bring mobiles/emails/the internet into the frame would have been much more jarring. AF might have been able to do it, but we'd've cut AF more slack!
The other thing that struck me was the slightly different take on the religious elements. It's striking, in canon, that none of the young characters, with the two notable exceptions of Ann and Patrick, believe in god. Nicola is interested in religion/catholicism, but not a believer, and all the rest have a cheerful unbelief. I found it very hard to believe in Lawrie telling Ann that she should have prayed for guidance, or in Nicola thinking that God might be nearer than she'd ever thought.
But overall, a good solid B.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 06:29 pm (UTC)Whereas Lawrie's main belief, as I recall, is in the power of Them.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 08:55 pm (UTC)One of the bits I loved about this book was Peter's description of his father arriving home to a house full of strange children - I thought this section very close to the 'real thing'.
I wasn't sure about the mention of their father sailing off to the Falklands war at the end, mainly because I thought that if the Falklands were going to be brought into it, we should have seen the Marlow girls worrying about it and talking about it at school. It would have been too major a thing to be happening in all their lives to be mentioned only in passing.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-05 12:46 pm (UTC)I agree that all the characters seemed to have been stuffed in just for the sake of being there. One of the things that works well in AF's books is the focus on different characters in each story. There's even a whole book without Nicola.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-21 03:12 pm (UTC)Ann's religion strikes me as more of a code of behaviour plus a set of practices, rather than an internal thing, as it is with Patrick.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 11:05 am (UTC)As the OP says, there isn't much entirely new, EXCEPT FOR Ginty's troubles - she's always wriggled out of difficulty before.
There are some great laugh-out-loud lines in there as well. I especially liked Chas's comment about Patrick and Nicola having lots of children together, and P&N's reaction.
There are huge differences between this and the original fanfic, no longer available online. I'm very sorry to lose Cory Corey, and although Broomhill in the original was absolutely too bad to be true, it's a great shame to lose all the Patrick angst that goes with it. And the ending to that fanfic was beautiful. My commiserations to all who didn't get to read it - I'm no publisher, but frankly the two are so different that I don't really see why the fanfic has to be withdrawn. Maybe the "deleted scenes" could be republished?
(As for the price of the pony, it's not way out. Nicola's windfall brought in £79 and a few shillings, if memory serves; that would be worth £2250 or so in 2011 prices, which is plenty to buy a pony.)
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 11:08 am (UTC)Nicola's windfall
From:Re: Nicola's windfall
From:Re: Nicola's windfall
From:Re: Nicola's windfall
From:Re: Nicola's windfall
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2011-11-04 10:53 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 11:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-09 08:07 am (UTC)Term or Peter's Room. They are both set in the late forties in
theory, although Peter's Room does contain some references that
are in fact fifties.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-09 09:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-09 08:58 pm (UTC)I do agree with other characters coming out as too Nicola, particularly Lawrie in the scene on the roof at the end, and her feelings before the play. That just didn't ring true to me. I can't see her being nervous in quite that way, or perhaps not introspective about it like that. She just never seems self-aware enough for some of the things in this book.
The Edward Oeschli thing coming out to everyone also didn't seem likely; in fact, I thought there were hints in Run Away Home about some generic future time when it was hinted that it hadn't actually come out, although I could very well be wrong about that.
I thought the ending was very harsh on Ginty, and wasn't altogether convinced by it, though I don't know whether that is a criticim of the book or just that I felt a bit sorry for her. Perhaps it's that I didn't know enough about her friends to know quite how they'd react, particularly Monica.
Plenty of re-used phrases and plot devices from previous novels, but that didn't stop me enjoying it, and there were lots of things I liked, including Nicola's visits to the cathedral.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-10 11:46 am (UTC)I enjoyed the novel a lot - to me, it was just like having a real AF to devour. In fact, I preferred it to Attic Term where I think AF was just too out of touch with the zeitgeist to convince, I found all the Changegear stuff horribly creaky. This was more in the spirit of, imo, her masterpiece -The Cricket Term.
Yes, perhaps too many characters were crammed in for the sake of it. I also found Patrick declaring his love so openly a bit unlikely, and as a Marlow would say "icky." As is pointed out, Nick is only 14, really too young for a grand love affair. I also thought Ginty's downfall was too complete - it leaves her with little room to move into if there's a follow up (and GGB, please note, I really hope there is because I would buy it). I think AF would have treated Ginty with slightly more ambivalence, she would either have fooled her friends, or the school, or her family - to see her shamed in everyone's eyes was too unsubtle.
To whoever said liberal use of italics - AF loved italics. Cricket Term is stuffed with them. Exclamation marks I didn't notice.
All in all, muchas congrats to Sally Hayward, I think she pulled it off as well as anyone could have done. Please write another soon - set at school, not Trennels!
no subject
Date: 2011-11-10 05:28 pm (UTC)Ginty - Lois similarity
Date: 2011-11-14 11:48 pm (UTC)Re: Ginty - Lois similarity CORRECTION + APOLOGY
From:no subject
Date: 2011-11-14 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-15 12:31 pm (UTC)Re the Falklands ending, I got the impression that he had only just been given the orders ie the conflict had barely started so the girls wouldn't really have been aware of it yet. Set up for a sequel, perhaps. Frankly, I hope the old duffer snuffs it, I have never cared for this absurdly absent father who makes much less sense the further the saga shifts in time and the (in character) scene of him being annoyed to find a houseful of people he doesn't recognise - including his own daughter's stepchildren he's apparently never met! - when he's never there just exacerbated this feeling.
Most entertaining passage was where Ginty muses on how Miss Keith has looked the same since the war and whether she'll still look young when she herself is 60 ... sneaky!
- Andrea
no subject
Date: 2011-12-16 03:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2012-02-25 01:16 am (UTC) - Expand