![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
It being Valentine’s Day and all, I feel the time has come to muse on Val Longstreet, and AF names in general. I was taken aback to learn Val’s full name was Valentine, partly because it’s comically incongruous with her character, and partly because I’ve never met or even heard of a real person called Valentine. I’d assumed her name was Valerie (rare but not unheard of). Was (or is) there a particular time and/or demographic in the UK where 'Valentine' was a reasonably common name?
The names of ongoing characters were an aspect of her books that AF couldn't shift to suit the different timeframes of her books, which must make for some interesting clashes in fashion. Being Australian, I don't know that much about what names would have been popular in schools like Kingscote in the eras when the books are set, but I'd guess, for example, that having two Margarets in a small class of girls might have been likely at the time of Autumn Term, but would have been unlikely by Attic Term.
It's also interesting to look at which names seem dated and which don't. 'Nicola', 'Rebecca', 'Karen' and 'Jenny' are as current as ever, at least to my Australian eye, but 'Erica', 'Lois', 'Virginia' and 'Barbara' seem of an earlier generation. I also suspect (again, without much knowledge of the context in posh UK circles at the time) that by Attic Term, AF chose names for new minor characters (e.g. the 'infants' in Ann's dorm) which were fashionable at the time when the novel was set. Then there's ones like 'Thalia', 'Pomona' and 'Unity', where I suspect AF was deliberately picking offbeat names.
Any thoughts from people who know more than me about UK naming fashions through the ages?
The names of ongoing characters were an aspect of her books that AF couldn't shift to suit the different timeframes of her books, which must make for some interesting clashes in fashion. Being Australian, I don't know that much about what names would have been popular in schools like Kingscote in the eras when the books are set, but I'd guess, for example, that having two Margarets in a small class of girls might have been likely at the time of Autumn Term, but would have been unlikely by Attic Term.
It's also interesting to look at which names seem dated and which don't. 'Nicola', 'Rebecca', 'Karen' and 'Jenny' are as current as ever, at least to my Australian eye, but 'Erica', 'Lois', 'Virginia' and 'Barbara' seem of an earlier generation. I also suspect (again, without much knowledge of the context in posh UK circles at the time) that by Attic Term, AF chose names for new minor characters (e.g. the 'infants' in Ann's dorm) which were fashionable at the time when the novel was set. Then there's ones like 'Thalia', 'Pomona' and 'Unity', where I suspect AF was deliberately picking offbeat names.
Any thoughts from people who know more than me about UK naming fashions through the ages?
no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 01:28 pm (UTC)I remember thinking it odd that Tim found Nicola's name unusual in Autumn Term, 'not like Joan or Peggy or Betty' as Joan and Peggy and Betty were names I associated with my grandmother's generation, and I was somewhere under ten and hadn't really worked out how old the book was.
All the youngish Margarets I've met have been Scottish, so maybe it stayed popular there longer than in England?
I was in classes with multiple Joannas and Fionas (not that I am at all posh) so I think AF's instincts were right there.
I think of Valentine as a boy's name, possibly due to Valentine Pelka (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0670893/). *wipes brow in relief that AF fandom was spared any kind of Blaise Zabini-like fandom flare-ups about Val Longstreet's gender*
no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 02:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 01:54 pm (UTC)What we need is a site tracking fictional popularity...
no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 01:59 pm (UTC)But there was also a (real-life) male actor Valentine Dyall as I recall.
It is possibly dating to say that 'Erica', 'Lois', 'Virginia' and 'Barbara' are all names that are to be found among my own contemporaries.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 02:22 pm (UTC)For what it's worth (I'm not British) my high school year (graduated 1999) had an Erica and a Virginia, but only one of each. Jennies in abundance.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 02:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 11:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 02:47 pm (UTC)I've always liked the name Rowan for a girl, though in light of the present Archbishop of Canterbury, I've gone off it slightly.
When I was at boarding school in the eighties, there were Nicolas, Virginias, Jennys, Mirandas and Sarahs but I don't remember any Ericas, Loises or Barbaras. And obviously not Thalia or Pomona. Has anyone ever met a Bunty?
The Marlow naming strategy has always struck me as rather odd. Karen, Ann and Nicola are good solid, dependable names while Rowan, Virginia (and Lawrence, though we at least have a reason for that) as much more flighty.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 04:08 pm (UTC)I think the only Marlow name AF *meant* to be ordinary and boring when she started writing was Ann, which ties in with her opinion of the character. It doesn't explain why the Marlow parents took one look at the baby and decided not to give her an unusual name like all the others though.
I have a second cousin who was known as Bunty as a child, although her real name was Frances. My mother was also sometimes called Bunty by her brother although again it's not her name. I can't imagine anyone being christened it.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 11:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 08:33 pm (UTC)Wasn't or isn't there a children's comic called Buntie? And has Baby Bunting, as in the nursery rhyme, got anything to do with it - a baby nickname?
no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 04:36 am (UTC)Only in a favorite childhood book about two rabbits called Billy and Bunty, so I've always thought of it as a rabbity name...
no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 03:19 pm (UTC)Barbara and Virginia seemed dated to me when I read the books in the 80s - Erica, Lois, Valerie etc would just be uncommon.
I did notice a correlation at my boarding school between upper-crust English families and wierd names - Lavinia, Luscinia, Dorcas, Honeysuckle, to name a few. Plus the Chinese girls who tended to end up with old-fashioned English names - Phyllis, Vivien, Violet, Susan.
We also had nine Sarahs in my year.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 04:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 03:39 pm (UTC)There was painter Val (for Valentine) Prinsep, related to the Stephens clan (V. Woolf etc.).
Fictional character- Valentine Warleggan (male) in the Poldark series.
However Val Gielgud, John's brother, seems to have been a Val not a Valentine.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 05:27 pm (UTC)At school in the 1960s, everybody was called Caroline, Susan or Ann/Anne - the majority spelt it with an E, after the Princess Royal had brought that spelling back into fashion, but there was a substantial minority who spelt it without. There were several Barbaras and Nicolas, and at least one Erica. There were even a couple of Joans and Pamelas, but those names were rapidly going out of style.
Apart from Rowan Marlow, I've only met male Rowans.
Karen is an oddity - it wasn't all that popular when I was very young, but it was very far from unknown, and often pronounced with a long "a". And at least one Karen at school was known as Kay. But it suddenly burst into popularity among children born in the late 1950s onwards, and, as far as I know, has been popular ever since.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 05:51 pm (UTC)Whereas, apart from the AoC, I've only met female ones!
I wonder if anyone else here has named a child of theirs after a character in an AF book?
-m-
no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 08:25 pm (UTC)Maybe one of them will have a daughter named Miranda! I've certainly made my preferences known...
no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 10:17 pm (UTC)I'd say that she's the polar opposite of AF's Lois, and yet somehow she isn't. I've never seen Lois as actually evil; rather as someone who makes very poor decisions in the heat of the moment, and genuinely believes she's doing things for the best, and then just doesn't understand why people have such disdain for her. OTOH, my daughter's only 7 so may yet grow out of it!
-m-
no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 02:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 08:49 pm (UTC)Nicola was a 1950s name, more English than anywhere else, and was then overtaken by Nicole. So Tim is right in finding it odd in the late 1940s. Erica was very popular when I was growing up in the USA, so early 1960s babies--not at all before that.
Valerie had a period of being fashionable, perhaps 1940s- 1950s, but Valentine not. I have a friend who named her son Sebastian Valentine because he was born on Valentine's Day. I'm sure he'll never forgive her.
I've always liked Rowan for a girls name too. My grandfather's name was Owen and I considered naming one of my girls Rowan and claiming it was for him, but it didn't sound good with my last name.
When I was a kid at least, the old-money Americans also gave their girls odder names than ordinary people did. My posh summer camp was populated by girls named Philippa, Timothea, India, Elliot, Ainley, etc., while my neighborhood school had girls named Kim, Betsy, Patty, and Jan. Boys of all classes always have more conservative names.
Karen is the really odd one. Maybe it was a trendy name for babies by 1948 and AF used it for an 18-year-old, which would have been unusual in reality. Sort of like calling a fictional teenager "Madison" would be today in America--nobody over age 10 is really called that.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-14 09:41 pm (UTC)(it's geebengrrl here, I can't log in at work)
Date: 2007-02-15 01:27 am (UTC)When I was in high school (1988-1993), Nicola was quite common though a bit posh. Every second girl had Ann/e as a middle name, but none as a first name. There were Karens, but mostly older than me. Patrick was prety common too (but almost always catholic). There were quite a lot of Lori/Laurie/Lorie's. But pronounced like 'lorry' - I have never quite worked out whether that's how Lawrie is pronounced or whether she's more law-ree. Also lots of Sallys and Maries (also a common middle name).
Jan/Barbara/Val/Margaret would all definitely be my mother's generation.
Also - there was one Unity at my school. Unfortunate child of hippy parents, her siblings were Willow and Sunshine.
I have always liked Rowan and am saving it up for any child I should have in the future.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 11:03 am (UTC)Didn't St Valentine get decanonised recently (or at Vatican II maybe?) Can't think AF would have approved...
no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 12:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 05:52 am (UTC)I was always surprised to see a Nicola in a 1940s book, since it seemed to be a popular name with children of my own age (born in the 1960s), as did Karen. Ann, Barbara and Margaret I thought of as old names (sort of Margaret Thatcher era ;-)) and Rowan and Lawrence I'd never come across for girls.
A friend here in Australia has a seven-year-old daughter called Erica.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-18 06:42 pm (UTC)A good friend of ours is called Thalia, but for the Greek, not AF! Her parents are conservative Afrikaans people, so she is generally happy that she didn't get a weird combination name, or even more peculiar inherited name (Jomar/Glodina/Sugnette/etc.)
no subject
Date: 2007-02-19 06:31 pm (UTC)Another thought about the Marlows and names: odd that the girls get the old Marlow family names (Lawrence, Nicholas) while Giles, the oldest boy, is named for one of his mother's dead brothers (Piers, Giles, Rollo, Terrance). I suppose that Peter too is named for Piers. Normally one would have expected the boys to be called Lawrence and Nicholas, and the girls to be Gillian and Petra.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-19 10:43 pm (UTC)(although we don't find out the brothers' names until End of Term, and unless AF was very organised about it all, I think that may just be a coincidence).
Also, I thought it was odd that 3 of her 4 brothers had very French names. Either Mrs Marlow comes from one of those old Norman families; or perhaps Madame Orly's 2nd husband was not the only French connection in her family?
no subject
Date: 2007-02-20 02:47 am (UTC)I think that all the brothers' names are quite old English ones, though maybe Norman or some such. Think Piers Ploughman. Giles I think is medieval too--though I'm less good on male names than female ones. Anyway, I don't think they connote a French connection, just a very old family. Only Terrance seems sort of modern to me.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-22 01:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-22 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-23 04:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-20 01:01 am (UTC)In the Autumn Term timeline, Giles would have been born not that long after the end of the war, which could be why he didn't get a Marlow name - they wanted to memorialise Pam's brothers and there'd be plenty more boys for Marlow names, or so Geoff Marlow and his supersperm would have expected. Or maybe also trying to repair the rift with Mme Orly?
no subject
Date: 2007-02-22 01:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-22 04:55 pm (UTC)