Relationship between twins
Jun. 5th, 2007 10:19 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Are there any psychologists here to tell us about the psychology of twinhood?
When I was reading the David Eddings series The Belgariad and associated other books, it mentioned that when you have twins, one will be more dominant over the other. One sign of which is that the less dominant twin will tend to speak about 'we' and 'us' and think of themselves as part of a set more than as an individual.
I'm not sure how much credence to give this idea, considering it was in a work of fiction. Particularly as I'm thinking about the idea in relation to another set of fictional twins. *grin* However, I've read elsewhere about the idea of dominance in twins.
In the Marlow series who do you see as the 'dominant' twin, if there is such a thing? Who tries to assert their individuality more?
My opinion (which is open to swaying by a good argument) is that Lawrie is more focussed on twinhood as her identity than Nicola. On the one hand she wants to be a famous actress and do her own thing, but she also seems to want to drag Nicola along with her. Yet then she doesn't like Nicola being in the limelight. She tends to be manipulative and whinge when she doesn't get her own way.
However, isn't it Lawrie who instigates the twin-swaps to further her own ends, which seems to show that she has some dominance over Nicola? (Actually I don't recall to well the finer details of those occasions.)
Yet it was Lawrie who tried to cut her own hair to match Nicola's new [accidental] haircut. Also, Lawrie seems to need more support from her bosom pal, to bolster her sense of self.
Has anyone else any thoughts on this, or heard other theories about the twins and their personalities?
When I was reading the David Eddings series The Belgariad and associated other books, it mentioned that when you have twins, one will be more dominant over the other. One sign of which is that the less dominant twin will tend to speak about 'we' and 'us' and think of themselves as part of a set more than as an individual.
I'm not sure how much credence to give this idea, considering it was in a work of fiction. Particularly as I'm thinking about the idea in relation to another set of fictional twins. *grin* However, I've read elsewhere about the idea of dominance in twins.
In the Marlow series who do you see as the 'dominant' twin, if there is such a thing? Who tries to assert their individuality more?
My opinion (which is open to swaying by a good argument) is that Lawrie is more focussed on twinhood as her identity than Nicola. On the one hand she wants to be a famous actress and do her own thing, but she also seems to want to drag Nicola along with her. Yet then she doesn't like Nicola being in the limelight. She tends to be manipulative and whinge when she doesn't get her own way.
However, isn't it Lawrie who instigates the twin-swaps to further her own ends, which seems to show that she has some dominance over Nicola? (Actually I don't recall to well the finer details of those occasions.)
Yet it was Lawrie who tried to cut her own hair to match Nicola's new [accidental] haircut. Also, Lawrie seems to need more support from her bosom pal, to bolster her sense of self.
Has anyone else any thoughts on this, or heard other theories about the twins and their personalities?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 08:28 am (UTC)The way their relationship develops, I think they are both taking steps away from their "twinness" throughout the series, however, I agree, I think Lawrie wants to maintain it more because Nicola looks after her and gives in to her in their relationship. Lawrie is a bit fed up by Nicola's relationship with Patrick (Falconer's Lure) and by her going off to spend the holiday with Miranda (Thuggery Affair) and Nicola is upset by the closeness of Lawrie and Tim's friendship in End of Term - but more by the realisation that Tim likes Lawrie better than her, than by loss of intimacy with Lawrie. I do think a crucial turning point comes in Ready Made Family when Nicola rides away from a sobbing Lawrie, and then, to her family's amazement, refuses to give in or compromise. After that, there does seem more distance between them - eg in Cricket Term, Nicola keeps her distance and effectively roots for Miranda when Lawrie is chucked out of the School Play.
What I've always thought WAS unlikely was that Nicola should sing brilliantly while Lawrie can't hold a tune! Surely that kind of thing must be genetically determined?
Welcome by the way...and excuse me rabbiting on!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 09:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 09:27 am (UTC)Having found this LJ community, I'm dying to get out my books and re-read them so I can have canon facts at my finger tips. I'm finding it singularly frustrating that I cannot do so!
It's been several years since I read Falconer's Lure. I don't think I purchased a copy of the GGB edition as I thought I had my own hardback...
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 11:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 02:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 09:34 am (UTC)Don't worry about rabbiting on. I'm rather overly verbose myself and don't want to be alone in blathering about this and that.
Hmm, so what you're getting at is that Lawrie and Nicola responded to how they were treated and how successful they were with various strategies of getting what they wanted, and in a way their personalities were moulded by that?
I remember some research when I was reading Education at Uni that looked at how boys and girls are treated from a young age, and how people mould them into different types of behaviour. The researchers had a pre-school child with haircut and clothing that didn't give away gender, and invited a series of people to come and play/interact with the child. Some were told the child was a boy, others were told it was a girl. Their perception of the child's gender meant that they encouraged and allowed certain behaviours whilst not encouraging others.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 01:49 pm (UTC)I like the bit in the End of Term twin swap, by the way, where Lawrie is pretending to be a sickly Nicola, and acting bravely pathetic - and Nicola wonders uneasily "if that was the way she talked when she was ill, it wasn't rather maddening for everyone".
It shows them watching each other and the way they act - and also the odd thing about Lawrie, that she is very acutely observant of other people, at the same time as not seeming to have much self-awareness.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 01:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-13 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 11:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 12:12 pm (UTC)The dominant bit fits with most people liking Nicola best, and probably treating Lawrie as a bit of an afterthought. Lawrie is good at sports, but not quite as good as Nicola, good at lessons, but not as bright as Nicola (or maybe just daydreams a lot?), Nicola can sing which is clearly a respected talent, Lawrie can't. It wouldn't be surprising if Lawrie saw herself simply as a crap version of Nicola and therefore clings more to being a twin as a way to get some of Nicola's reflected glory.
How they act in private is somewhat different to how the outside world sees them, but it seems as if Nicola is still used to being the responsible one. I think the twin swaps aren't about dominance - both of them got something out of it (one over on Marie Dobson, for example).
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 02:10 pm (UTC)We are told, when Nicola refuses to give way about the pony, that this is unusual.
If we can say that Laurie is manipulative, can't we also say that this is her way of dominating.
It also occurs to me that twinship within a large family has less of an impact on the twins themselves than it does in small family, there being so many other influences on their relationship.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 04:32 pm (UTC)He'd probably find her more annoying, too.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 11:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 08:40 am (UTC)Twins
Date: 2007-06-05 02:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-03 02:45 am (UTC)chromosomes
Date: 2007-10-06 05:02 pm (UTC)Having said that Nicola and Lawrie seem to be particularly different for identical twins, but twin studies do show that twins often get labelled from quite early on and that parents will rate their twins as more different than they 'really' are - i.e. parents will think one twin is more able than the other, for example, whereas if you do ability testing they will be much more similar. Maybe everyone does this, when we have two identical people we need to look for differences rather than similarities, and so the differences seem to be accentuated. Mind you, all the Marlow sibs seem very different to each other, apart from their generally high achieving ethos.
Re: chromosomes
Date: 2007-10-06 08:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-23 12:09 am (UTC)As for the acting/singing thing ~ they are both creative & *idential twins* is a misnomer. My science isn't brilliant but I do get that even identials have some difference in their genetic make~up[ think fingerprints & footprints] & these can be subtley enhanced or subdued by environmental factors. Twins, especially identicals who share so many common traits, will also seek an area of individuality & not intrude on the twin's area. That has been our experience.
Bear in mind that while Lawrie appears to be the more needy twin Nick was terribly upset when Lawrie asked for Tim in preference to herself at the height of their fight[End of Term]. Usually the twin bond dominates all others irregardless of how strong the personality. Suspect Antonia Forest knew at least one set of twins very well indeed.