Fatherhood in the Forest
Apr. 8th, 2005 09:44 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Reading through people's comments on the last post, I found myself musing on the fathers depicted in the Marlow series. Even though none of them play a major role, there's quite a range.
The omniabsent Commander Marlow seems the kind of father who sees putting an expensively framed cabinet portrait of the family in his room as a substitute for taking leave to see them (see also Nicola's preference for a photo of Giles' ship and Nelson over photos of her family members?), but otherwise appears a friendly, no-nonsense sort of fellow. You have to smile at his pragmatic military preference for Nicola's crew cut in Falconer's Lure.
Arguably the most negative depiction of a father in the series is Mr Hopkins. When Berenice proclaims Meg's tormented family life to the masses, Meg shifts from being a workaholic nonentity to a disturbing reflection of her father's abuse, reinforced by his brief, dour cameo near the end of The Cricket Term (in which Forest hints that he also abuses his wife). On the subject of pastoral care at Kingscote, it's faintly reassuring that the school did attempt to intervene on Meg's behalf, even though it didn't succeed.
Mr West is warm and engaging; Mr Merrick is wry and genial, and seems to have a pretty healthy relationship with his son, where Patrick respects the boundaries he sets and wants his approval without fearing him. Our fleeting glimpse of Mr Todd suggests to me a conservative pillar of community type who indulges and secretly enjoys the eccentricities of his wife. Then, of course, there's Edwin, who is the only father whose parenting we see centre stage in the series.
There was a very interesting discussion of Edwin on Girl's Own in 1998 or so, which revealed a divide among Forest fans. Some would have happily had him locked up for the riding crop scene; others agreed that this was appalling behaviour, but allowed him more leeway. He is certainly a stern and authoritarian parent, though when he see him he is under a lot of stress and seems used to being the disciplinarian half of the parental team: see Rose's appeal to Mrs Marlow when he pushes her to stop reading and go outside. I'm not sure what I think of him as a parent, but he's certainly an interesting and complex character.
What do other people think about Edwin, and Forest fathers in general?
The omniabsent Commander Marlow seems the kind of father who sees putting an expensively framed cabinet portrait of the family in his room as a substitute for taking leave to see them (see also Nicola's preference for a photo of Giles' ship and Nelson over photos of her family members?), but otherwise appears a friendly, no-nonsense sort of fellow. You have to smile at his pragmatic military preference for Nicola's crew cut in Falconer's Lure.
Arguably the most negative depiction of a father in the series is Mr Hopkins. When Berenice proclaims Meg's tormented family life to the masses, Meg shifts from being a workaholic nonentity to a disturbing reflection of her father's abuse, reinforced by his brief, dour cameo near the end of The Cricket Term (in which Forest hints that he also abuses his wife). On the subject of pastoral care at Kingscote, it's faintly reassuring that the school did attempt to intervene on Meg's behalf, even though it didn't succeed.
Mr West is warm and engaging; Mr Merrick is wry and genial, and seems to have a pretty healthy relationship with his son, where Patrick respects the boundaries he sets and wants his approval without fearing him. Our fleeting glimpse of Mr Todd suggests to me a conservative pillar of community type who indulges and secretly enjoys the eccentricities of his wife. Then, of course, there's Edwin, who is the only father whose parenting we see centre stage in the series.
There was a very interesting discussion of Edwin on Girl's Own in 1998 or so, which revealed a divide among Forest fans. Some would have happily had him locked up for the riding crop scene; others agreed that this was appalling behaviour, but allowed him more leeway. He is certainly a stern and authoritarian parent, though when he see him he is under a lot of stress and seems used to being the disciplinarian half of the parental team: see Rose's appeal to Mrs Marlow when he pushes her to stop reading and go outside. I'm not sure what I think of him as a parent, but he's certainly an interesting and complex character.
What do other people think about Edwin, and Forest fathers in general?
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 12:38 pm (UTC)Thinking over all the rest!
So I did...
Date: 2005-04-16 05:23 am (UTC)Now you mention it, that was a tad eccentric of him. I suspect we see an echo of his whimsy in the wry, breezy way Tim relates to other figures of authority: "Actually, I want a lot of special privileges. All I can get." Heh heh heh. At some point I'll have to post an entry on Tim in this community and take on all her detractors...
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 02:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 03:46 pm (UTC)I like Mr Merrick, which isn't something I ever thought I'd say of a Conservative MP. I think my favourite moment of his is when he's knocked sideways by Patrick saying that perhaps he shouldn't be at a Catholic school whilst the Church is saying 'all the wrong things'.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 11:27 pm (UTC)For me, the more interesting question has always been 'why Edwin, for Kay?' I still don't have a satisfactory answer to this.
Hello as well? Am so pleased that this community has been formed.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 12:44 pm (UTC)I see the whole riding crop thing as Edwin having sat on his own temper for so long (though it definitely leaks out around the sides and terrifies Rose and to a lesser extent Chas) that when it does get loose it gets loose in a much more cataclysmic way than he or anyone else expected.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 01:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 01:56 pm (UTC)From the horse's mouth...
Date: 2005-04-08 11:42 pm (UTC)I actually asked "So then, why *did* Kay marry Edwin?", to which AF replied in quelling tones "Because he fancied her." Very much a tone of 'that's their business'. Not taking the message, I was foolish enough to follow up with "Then why did Edwin marry Kay?" "Because she fancied him." Subject closed.
Re: From the horse's mouth...
Date: 2005-04-08 11:49 pm (UTC)Re: From the horse's mouth...
Date: 2005-04-09 12:33 pm (UTC)As for the 'Because she fancies him' / 'Because he fancies her' I actually do think Edwin must have some kind of animal magnetism or at least slow-burning charm, because it's clearly not his looks or his outgoing nature that have attracted two wives. Perhaps he's quite genuinely Mr Rochester-like to those inclined that way.
Re: From the horse's mouth...
Date: 2005-04-09 01:12 pm (UTC)Re: From the horse's mouth...
Date: 2005-04-09 03:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 01:47 am (UTC)I like Mr Merrick, too, despite his politics. I like him mostly because he takes Patrick and Nicola seriously - he talks to them as adults, while respecting Nicola's teenage scruples, and he has no trouble believing that Patrick might have intellectually interesting ideas on Vatican II.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 07:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 10:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-10 08:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-11 08:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 06:56 pm (UTC)Er, hello everyone, by the way.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 10:13 pm (UTC)I often wonder whether Mrs Marlow got so exasperated at that point not so much because Rowan was whiskey-fuelled and tactless but because she hardened Karen's resolve.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 08:41 pm (UTC)Mostly I like Mr Merrick, but every once in a while I find myself imagining him being involved in some sleazy scandal. Sucking Claudie's toes perhaps?
What do other people think about the marriages in AF? I cannot think of an ideal partnership, the only happily married couple immediately springing to mind are the Tranters who aren't really mainstream characters. Most of the couples seem to have one likeable party and one cold fish (the Merricks, the Wests, arguably Karen and Edwin). Mrs Marlow is a single parent for much of the time, and seems to have issues with her own mother, while her father is conspicuous by the absence of any mention. Even Ginty/Patrick is beset with awkwardness and misunderstanding rather than being an idyllic first love.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 10:18 pm (UTC)I found Mrs Merrick relatively likeable when she was saying 'couldn't he just leave out that question?' and later at the concert - perhaps she's just not particularly good with the human young either and that's why she doesn't click with Nicola. Or possibly she thinks Nicola is liable to lead Patrick into more of the sort of adventures that lead to falling off cliffs. As opposed to what she probably suspects Ginty of wanting to lead him into, though I don't think there was ever much actual likelihood of it.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 11:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 11:36 pm (UTC)One of the glories of Forest is that she eschews the literary cliche in favour of what actually might have happened. I missed the tide of the previous post, but the point I wanted to make is that Forest is almost unique in 'children's writers' in that she doesn't go for the cliche of 'justice is done; right will triumph' and hence Kingscote is not necessarily a 'good' or 'bad' school, but a much more ambiguous one, from which some children emerge redeemed and some forever scarred.
Nicola and Lawrie are never vindicated. Lois and Marie are never found out (although they get it in the neck in other ways). Miss Keith, who in the hands of another writer would be the moral authority, is at times the perpetrator of injustice, and even when she does the 'right thing' (allow the play in Autumn Term) it's clearly because of her personal values rather than any definition of right and wrong that informs the series.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 11:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 12:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 12:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 03:41 pm (UTC)As far as the only-one-child thing goes, I think I assumed fertility problems which neither of the Merricks actually found that distressing. Though whilst I suspect Mr Merrick actually does follow the Church's teachings on contraception, I wouldn't be in any way surprised if Mrs Merrick had quietly taken steps to make sure there weren't any more, thank you.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-10 12:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 11:19 am (UTC)Patrick doesn't strike me as particularly uncompromising apart from the Vatican II thing. Patrick is, I think, fundamentally honest, which is the main reason Ginty/Patrick was never going to last. And as for warmth and empathy, I'll concede those (I think Patrick is a Myers-Briggs T), but Mrs Merrick would be the pot calling the kettle black. And everyone takes themselves seriously at sixteen. I found the bit, actually : "I'm a very serious person." And wondered if that were true.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 11:30 pm (UTC)I always thought Ginty needed a Rhett Butler kind of person; someone who doesn't care that she's a vain, changeable piece of fluff; someone that sees behind the pretty mask.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 12:40 pm (UTC)I hadn't considered the similarities between Ginty and Scarlett - that's really interesting!
I think what Ginty mostly needs is several years of standing on her own two feet.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 07:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 07:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 08:46 pm (UTC)I leave no tern unstoned
Date: 2005-04-09 10:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 03:49 pm (UTC)Hmmm: one does wonder where Patrick gets the 'only in marriage or if it's paid for' theory of when sexual activity is permissible...
no subject
Date: 2005-04-09 04:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 09:17 pm (UTC)absent naval fathers
Date: 2005-08-05 08:31 pm (UTC)Also, who was it who said that the first requirement for an author of children's stories was to work out a convincing way of getting rid of the parents?
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 02:40 pm (UTC)<> Hmmm: one does wonder where Patrick gets the 'only in marriage or if it's paid for' theory of when sexual activity is permissible... <>
I never thought of the 'paid for' as actually being financial - probably me being v dense and naive, but I thought more of a 'paid for' as in morally paid for - i.e. if you were in a committed relationship then it was more acceptable.
Also, I love Captain Marlow - esp in Falconer's Lure when he is quoting the Jabberwocky at Lawrie.
His relationship with Jon seems to have been a good one too.