Continuation of the Marlow line
May. 18th, 2006 11:37 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
The discussion about Kay below made me wonder how many children each of the Marlows would end up producing. I hope this hasn't been discussed before - if so I apologise! My thoughts are as follows:
Giles - lots, of course. Borne by a meek and long-suffering wife?
Kay - not sure. Maybe two, by a later marriage.
Rowan - I haven't decided whether Rowan will settle down in a same-sex partnership, in which case I don't think she will bother with children, or whether she will marry, initially decline children, but then suddenly decide in her mid-thirties that her biological clock is ticking and ultimately end up with two sons.
Ann - Ann will marry mid-twenties and - ironically and unfairly - have great difficulty conceiving. They will adopt two children before she finally produces a daughter.
Ginty - boy and girl? Followed by divorce?
Peter - don't know. Perhaps he will surprise everyone by becoming the real pater familias?
Nick - I reckon four boys, and would quite like them to be by Robert Anquetil.
Lawrie - after a succession of affairs with her leading men (and because she likes to shock and likes the attention probably a couple of leading ladies too), Lawrie will settle down with a somewhat older and very dashing film star, will initially reject the idea of children, but aged 37 will suddenly decide she wants one and immediately and without difficulty produce a daughter, which will really rub Ann's nose in it.
What does everyone else think?
Giles - lots, of course. Borne by a meek and long-suffering wife?
Kay - not sure. Maybe two, by a later marriage.
Rowan - I haven't decided whether Rowan will settle down in a same-sex partnership, in which case I don't think she will bother with children, or whether she will marry, initially decline children, but then suddenly decide in her mid-thirties that her biological clock is ticking and ultimately end up with two sons.
Ann - Ann will marry mid-twenties and - ironically and unfairly - have great difficulty conceiving. They will adopt two children before she finally produces a daughter.
Ginty - boy and girl? Followed by divorce?
Peter - don't know. Perhaps he will surprise everyone by becoming the real pater familias?
Nick - I reckon four boys, and would quite like them to be by Robert Anquetil.
Lawrie - after a succession of affairs with her leading men (and because she likes to shock and likes the attention probably a couple of leading ladies too), Lawrie will settle down with a somewhat older and very dashing film star, will initially reject the idea of children, but aged 37 will suddenly decide she wants one and immediately and without difficulty produce a daughter, which will really rub Ann's nose in it.
What does everyone else think?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 10:10 am (UTC)I think I'd have to read well-written Nicola/Robert to sell me on it - the age gap makes me a bit queasy, which I don't think would bother me if Nicola's main ambition was, say, to win the Ashes with the first mixed England cricket team, but since she's so focused on things nautical and he's already been there and done that...
I can absolutely see small blond children of Rowan's showing up at the Westbridge Infants, meeting a very right-on teacher say 'Now, you have two mummies and that's absolutely OK', looking at each other in very infant-Nick-and-Lawrie perplexity and then saying politely 'We also have New Forest ponies and pigs.'
no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 10:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 10:52 am (UTC)"Mummy Rowan says only fools and the British Army mess around unnecessarily with plumbing. So stop stuffing his head down the toilet."
As far as Peter goes in general, I always thought his disastrous taste in friends might also translate over into disastrous taste in partners, too, though there's always Selby as a beacon of sensibleness.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 06:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-19 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-19 06:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 10:16 am (UTC)I really don't know why so many people peg Ginty for divorce.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 10:17 am (UTC)Because she sometimes comes across as flaky with a tendency to bail out at the first sign of trouble?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 10:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 10:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 10:20 am (UTC)I think because she wouldn't be so desperate for children, and going the additional steps required if you haven't got an available source of sperm in your bedroom would probably put her off. She'd get another horse instead. Of course things might be different if her partner madly wanted children, I suppose.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 10:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 10:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 11:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 02:38 pm (UTC)Oh, it would be frightening if you had hordes of Marlow-spawn in your school. You'd simply have to change profession.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 10:44 pm (UTC)Rowan will spend some time dealing with this break-up, raising horses and designing high-end ranch buildings, and coming to understand herself and what being alone really means. Finally, on one of her architecture trips into Berkeley, she will meet a glamorous (female) art historian with three charming daughters adopted from various Eurasian countries. She will fall completely in love and slip seamlessly into a kind of brusque, amusing, slightly detached parental role. She will introduce these urban, cosmopolitan yet eccentric kids to the joys of riding and the country life. They will adore her as much as their mother does.
OK, so I'm into projection. Who isn't? I always adored Rowan from the distance created by fiction vs. reality, but feel that I'm now ready for her!
no subject
Date: 2006-05-19 08:01 am (UTC)(Please note, all, that I really don't think of Triptych (http://rose-and-lizard.livejournal.com/17761.html) as in any way an authorised version of the Marlow futures! There is room for all of us to play in the world AF created. Though as I was saying to
no subject
Date: 2006-05-19 02:28 pm (UTC)Oh my yes. My oldest daughter (age 10) is a truly excellent ballet dancer who loves staging performances and dreams of attending the San Francisco School of Ballet. As real life and fiction come together here, I can see some unexpected Forest/Noel Streatfield crossovers. Hideous competition and envy from Sophia Marlow-Law, while [Rowan's] daughter Margaret is wifty and eccentric and completely unaware of how annoying her natural talent is to those around her. The fact that Margaret lived in an orphanage for the first 7 years of her life will simply add to the Streatfieldishness of it all.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-19 02:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-19 08:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 10:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 10:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 10:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 10:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 10:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 10:44 am (UTC)Though someone would probably have pointed out to her in short order that, with three or possibly four other children under five at that point, Mrs Marlow had things to do other than pull eighteen-hour days sitting around on a film set.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 10:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 11:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 11:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 11:17 am (UTC)Don't give me terrible ideas for Marlows / Labyrinth crossovers! :)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-20 09:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 02:06 pm (UTC)And I also agree that there is no real reason to write off Ginty's future just because the Merricks don't fancy her as a future DIL. Outside the Marlowverse she would come across as a very normal teenage girl. I don't think many of us would want to feel we hadn't developed as a person since we were 15.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-19 12:25 pm (UTC)I've always wondered whether Helena Merrick just hates her because she's stunningly pretty and Pater Merrick just feels that Patrick's getting too instense too young - he is VERY intense about everything cf classical music, and I think Daddy probably just wants him to live a little.
I have also been thinking, a lot, about young Virginia's future life, but more of that later perhaps.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-19 11:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-19 02:50 pm (UTC)A macrobiotic diet might be a pleasant change from school dinners and Mrs Bertie's traditional cuisine!
no subject
Date: 2006-05-19 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-19 08:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-19 08:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 03:09 pm (UTC)Let's see - Karen is put off for life by Chas, Rose and Fob and does not reproduce, either with Edwin, or in her subsequent relationship with one of her doctoral students, when she is a classics don at St Hilda's.
Children would mess with Nicola's solo sailing tours.
No one will let the insufferably smug Giles close enough to them to give him a chance to reproduce.
Fob grows up to be a dark, chunky, smouldering femme fatale, pursues Peter till he gives in and they have two children, one dark and square-set, the other thin and blonde.
Lawrie gets pregnant by one of her leading men, but decides that Lady Macbeth can't really have a bump, so terminates the pregnancy in 'the Play is All' mode. Ann is horrified. Lawrie rolls her eyes, unable to believe in such wetness, but is subsequently more careful about the pill.
The reproductive fates of the other Marlows are hidden from me... But Patrick is gay, and eventually rejects Catholicism violently, forming a lifelong relationship with a taciturn local farmer, with whom he hunts, hawks and is blissfully happy.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 03:14 pm (UTC)As for my generosity in allocating babies - you are quite right, it is a bit over the top, but upper-class families do do a lot of breeding - as Lady Sybil says, it is what they are bred to do!
no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 09:47 pm (UTC)It is wonderful the number of different futures that can be plausibly spun out for AF's characters. I think it's a tribute to her powers of characterisation.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-19 08:37 am (UTC)Yes that's right. Poor old Patrick! And his poor parents - they'd probably have preferred him to marry Ginty. Though perhaps I underestimate them? Can't someone write a fanfic?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-18 10:36 pm (UTC)And I am now seeing Patrick and said farmer as Ted and Ralph from the Fast Show. Hee.
Promethea